<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Buzz: Mets to Make Significant Run for A-Rod</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.metsblog.com/2007/11/06/buzz-mets-to-make-significant-run-for-a-rod/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2007/11/06/buzz-mets-to-make-significant-run-for-a-rod/</link>
	<description>MetsBlog.com features the latest Mets rumors, player movement, and news circulating around the Internet, as well as Mets related insights and opinions by Matthew Cerrone and his team of guest bloggers.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:41:23 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: VCarver</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2007/11/06/buzz-mets-to-make-significant-run-for-a-rod/#comment-37369</link>
		<dc:creator>VCarver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 23:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2007/11/06/buzz-mets-to-make-significant-run-for-a-rod/#comment-37369</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not buying into your WHIP criteria because fact is Bradford&#039;s WHIP has been under 1.300 for 7 out of his 10 years. That fits my cirteria of bing good at least 2 out of 3 years. So Bradford counts.

And Mahay pitched most of his career in severe hitters parks. So of course his WHIP is gong to be higher.  He also fits my criteria of 2 out 3 years being good in terms of ERA and WHIP. 

Feliciano also fits since all but one of his years was good (I&#039;m excluding his first year when he only pitched 6 innings). 

While 3 of those mentioned were mets in &#039;07, only two of them pitched this year. So, no, the Mets bullpen was NOT good this year and if you think so then maybe you were not watching the games very carefully.  

So that&#039;s 10 pitchers that I came up with in just minutes. There are undoubtedly more. The point still stands, it&#039;s utter cr@p that all middle relievers are a cr@pshoot. They clearly are not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not buying into your WHIP criteria because fact is Bradford&#8217;s WHIP has been under 1.300 for 7 out of his 10 years. That fits my cirteria of bing good at least 2 out of 3 years. So Bradford counts.</p>
<p>And Mahay pitched most of his career in severe hitters parks. So of course his WHIP is gong to be higher.  He also fits my criteria of 2 out 3 years being good in terms of ERA and WHIP. </p>
<p>Feliciano also fits since all but one of his years was good (I&#8217;m excluding his first year when he only pitched 6 innings). </p>
<p>While 3 of those mentioned were mets in &#8216;07, only two of them pitched this year. So, no, the Mets bullpen was NOT good this year and if you think so then maybe you were not watching the games very carefully.  </p>
<p>So that&#8217;s 10 pitchers that I came up with in just minutes. There are undoubtedly more. The point still stands, it&#8217;s utter cr@p that all middle relievers are a cr@pshoot. They clearly are not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BiggieSmalls</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2007/11/06/buzz-mets-to-make-significant-run-for-a-rod/#comment-37357</link>
		<dc:creator>BiggieSmalls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 22:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2007/11/06/buzz-mets-to-make-significant-run-for-a-rod/#comment-37357</guid>
		<description>i see im .. im burying this thread.. catching up on the other one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i see im .. im burying this thread.. catching up on the other one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BiggieSmalls</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2007/11/06/buzz-mets-to-make-significant-run-for-a-rod/#comment-37355</link>
		<dc:creator>BiggieSmalls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 22:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2007/11/06/buzz-mets-to-make-significant-run-for-a-rod/#comment-37355</guid>
		<description>Bradford -- 1.41. and 1.438 WHIP in 05/07
Riske  -- ill give you him
Mahay -- 1.76 and 1.44 WHIP in 05/06
Heilman -- OK.. want him off the team but OK
Sanchez -- Duaner? i expect him back in 08
Feliciano -pitched in Japan in 05 -
Howry -- good player
Linebrink (when younger) -- hasnt been bad
Qualls -- good young pitcher
Rauch -- good..

three of your picks were Mets in 2007
 you are making my point that the BP wasnt that bad

Although Duaner hasnt pitched in over a year.. 

nice.. didnt think you&#039;d get that many.. more the exception than the rule.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bradford &#8212; 1.41. and 1.438 WHIP in 05/07<br />
Riske  &#8212; ill give you him<br />
Mahay &#8212; 1.76 and 1.44 WHIP in 05/06<br />
Heilman &#8212; OK.. want him off the team but OK<br />
Sanchez &#8212; Duaner? i expect him back in 08<br />
Feliciano -pitched in Japan in 05 -<br />
Howry &#8212; good player<br />
Linebrink (when younger) &#8212; hasnt been bad<br />
Qualls &#8212; good young pitcher<br />
Rauch &#8212; good..</p>
<p>three of your picks were Mets in 2007<br />
 you are making my point that the BP wasnt that bad</p>
<p>Although Duaner hasnt pitched in over a year.. </p>
<p>nice.. didnt think you&#8217;d get that many.. more the exception than the rule.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VCarver</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2007/11/06/buzz-mets-to-make-significant-run-for-a-rod/#comment-37280</link>
		<dc:creator>VCarver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 21:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2007/11/06/buzz-mets-to-make-significant-run-for-a-rod/#comment-37280</guid>
		<description>BTW, I did the 2009 LT payroll. I posted it in a newer thread from today because the topic was relevant. It is here:

http://www.metsblog.com/2007/11/06/buzz-mets-to-make-significant-run-for-a-rod/#comment-37278</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, I did the 2009 LT payroll. I posted it in a newer thread from today because the topic was relevant. It is here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.metsblog.com/2007/11/06/buzz-mets-to-make-significant-run-for-a-rod/#comment-37278" rel="nofollow">http://www.metsblog.com/2007/11/06/buzz-mets-to-make-significant-run-for-a-rod/#comment-37278</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VCarver</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2007/11/06/buzz-mets-to-make-significant-run-for-a-rod/#comment-37278</link>
		<dc:creator>VCarver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 21:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2007/11/06/buzz-mets-to-make-significant-run-for-a-rod/#comment-37278</guid>
		<description>Your injury criteria is nonsense. If GMs avoided giving multi-year contracts to any player who has had an injury over the previous 3 yeasr, almost every player in the majors would be on 1 year contracts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your injury criteria is nonsense. If GMs avoided giving multi-year contracts to any player who has had an injury over the previous 3 yeasr, almost every player in the majors would be on 1 year contracts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VCarver</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2007/11/06/buzz-mets-to-make-significant-run-for-a-rod/#comment-37274</link>
		<dc:creator>VCarver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 21:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2007/11/06/buzz-mets-to-make-significant-run-for-a-rod/#comment-37274</guid>
		<description>Bradford
Riske
Mahay
Heilman
Sanchez 
Feliciano
Howry
Linebrink  (when younger)
Qualls
Rauch</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bradford<br />
Riske<br />
Mahay<br />
Heilman<br />
Sanchez<br />
Feliciano<br />
Howry<br />
Linebrink  (when younger)<br />
Qualls<br />
Rauch</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BiggieSmalls</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2007/11/06/buzz-mets-to-make-significant-run-for-a-rod/#comment-37236</link>
		<dc:creator>BiggieSmalls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 20:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2007/11/06/buzz-mets-to-make-significant-run-for-a-rod/#comment-37236</guid>
		<description>A- Not  A Closer

B - Currently in the League

C - His last three years had A WHIP at or below 1.35  

D- has not had an injury in the past three years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A- Not  A Closer</p>
<p>B &#8211; Currently in the League</p>
<p>C &#8211; His last three years had A WHIP at or below 1.35  </p>
<p>D- has not had an injury in the past three years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BiggieSmalls</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2007/11/06/buzz-mets-to-make-significant-run-for-a-rod/#comment-37221</link>
		<dc:creator>BiggieSmalls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 20:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2007/11/06/buzz-mets-to-make-significant-run-for-a-rod/#comment-37221</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;This idea that all middle relievers are a cr@pshoot is total cr@p. I know some like to spout that, but it doesn’t make sense when there are many relievers around who are consistently good.&lt;/I&gt;

Name TEN that are CONSISTENTLY GOOD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>This idea that all middle relievers are a cr@pshoot is total cr@p. I know some like to spout that, but it doesn’t make sense when there are many relievers around who are consistently good.</i></p>
<p>Name TEN that are CONSISTENTLY GOOD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VCarver</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2007/11/06/buzz-mets-to-make-significant-run-for-a-rod/#comment-37107</link>
		<dc:creator>VCarver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 18:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2007/11/06/buzz-mets-to-make-significant-run-for-a-rod/#comment-37107</guid>
		<description>Sure, $3+ million for a pitcher whose back of his baseball card is primarily bad numbers is a bad deal. For a pitcher like Bradford though, whose baseball card sports predominantly good numbers, then it&#039;s a good risk. 

This idea that all middle relievers are a cr@pshoot is total cr@p. I know some like to spout that, but it doesn&#039;t make sense when there are many relievers around who are consistently good.

If you get 2 out of 3 good years from a middle reliever like Bradford, then it&#039;s a successful contract. That&#039;s about what you&#039;re going to get with most starters and most closers anyway. 

Smith as we saw couldn&#039;t even make it through the whole season. If I had to choose between him and Bradford this year, it&#039;s Bradford all the way. And Collazo hasn&#039;t done anything yet in the majors. 

Of course I&#039;d like to give the Smiths and Collazos opportunities. But they also need to have relievers who can be more of a sure thing as well. That doesn&#039;t mean Mota or Show. They are two of Omar&#039;s worst signings since he became GM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, $3+ million for a pitcher whose back of his baseball card is primarily bad numbers is a bad deal. For a pitcher like Bradford though, whose baseball card sports predominantly good numbers, then it&#8217;s a good risk. </p>
<p>This idea that all middle relievers are a cr@pshoot is total cr@p. I know some like to spout that, but it doesn&#8217;t make sense when there are many relievers around who are consistently good.</p>
<p>If you get 2 out of 3 good years from a middle reliever like Bradford, then it&#8217;s a successful contract. That&#8217;s about what you&#8217;re going to get with most starters and most closers anyway. </p>
<p>Smith as we saw couldn&#8217;t even make it through the whole season. If I had to choose between him and Bradford this year, it&#8217;s Bradford all the way. And Collazo hasn&#8217;t done anything yet in the majors. </p>
<p>Of course I&#8217;d like to give the Smiths and Collazos opportunities. But they also need to have relievers who can be more of a sure thing as well. That doesn&#8217;t mean Mota or Show. They are two of Omar&#8217;s worst signings since he became GM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BiggieSmalls</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2007/11/06/buzz-mets-to-make-significant-run-for-a-rod/#comment-37071</link>
		<dc:creator>BiggieSmalls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 18:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2007/11/06/buzz-mets-to-make-significant-run-for-a-rod/#comment-37071</guid>
		<description>I put Show and Mota in different categories just for the reason of the commitment in years.. although they both sucked it to the same degree.

While they both come in around 3 mil 2008 --  Mota is for JUST 2008 (3.2) while Show is at the trough for two more years (2007 - 2009 ) at 3.6 per.. 

3+ mil for two years I can stomach for a guy with a history of success.. but three years..with these middle/setup guys you are just as  likely to get two bad and one good as two good and one bad..and with the competitive environment in FA relief pitchers vs the odds of RP uncovering some forgotten jewel.. id much rather take my chances with the joe smiths and willie collazos of the world .. even a jorge sosa project has merits for one year in the pen.

ChadBrad certainly didnt set the world on fire this year.. and he&#039;s locked up with the O&#039;s for another 2 yrs at over 3 mil a year.

Its a fickle breed.. these BP guys

As for Riske.. given that he had a good 2007  in KC he had less pressure situations than a toll booth attendant...And while he did OK with Cleveland in 05 his 06 wasn&#039;t exactly a revelation.  same deal with 03 vs 04

Again. these middle guys go in and out like the tide.so its more a three year aversion that a 3+ mil aversion.. 

Save for your closer.. I wouldn&#039;t commit more than 12-14 mil to the back of the pen.. including the setup role... id rather spend the dough on a guy that can actually go 7 innings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I put Show and Mota in different categories just for the reason of the commitment in years.. although they both sucked it to the same degree.</p>
<p>While they both come in around 3 mil 2008 &#8212;  Mota is for JUST 2008 (3.2) while Show is at the trough for two more years (2007 &#8211; 2009 ) at 3.6 per.. </p>
<p>3+ mil for two years I can stomach for a guy with a history of success.. but three years..with these middle/setup guys you are just as  likely to get two bad and one good as two good and one bad..and with the competitive environment in FA relief pitchers vs the odds of RP uncovering some forgotten jewel.. id much rather take my chances with the joe smiths and willie collazos of the world .. even a jorge sosa project has merits for one year in the pen.</p>
<p>ChadBrad certainly didnt set the world on fire this year.. and he&#8217;s locked up with the O&#8217;s for another 2 yrs at over 3 mil a year.</p>
<p>Its a fickle breed.. these BP guys</p>
<p>As for Riske.. given that he had a good 2007  in KC he had less pressure situations than a toll booth attendant&#8230;And while he did OK with Cleveland in 05 his 06 wasn&#8217;t exactly a revelation.  same deal with 03 vs 04</p>
<p>Again. these middle guys go in and out like the tide.so its more a three year aversion that a 3+ mil aversion.. </p>
<p>Save for your closer.. I wouldn&#8217;t commit more than 12-14 mil to the back of the pen.. including the setup role&#8230; id rather spend the dough on a guy that can actually go 7 innings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.116 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2009-11-08 09:45:29 -->
