Marty Noble at MLB.com discusses David Wright and National League MVP voting.
“A 30-30 season; career highs in batting average, runs, home runs and stolen bases; and team-best finishes in batting average, slugging percentage, on-base percentage and total bases were factors in Wright receiving the most points among Mets players, 182, in the voting by the Baseball Writers’ Association of America.”
Also, Dayn Perry at Fox Sports joins Rob Neyer at ESPN in thinking Wright should have won the NL MVP.
“On the year, Wright authored a batting line of .325 AVG/.416 OBP/.546 SLG with 74 extra-base hits, all while playing his home games in a park that’s quite tough on right-handed batters. Throw in his Gold Glove defense and his 34 steals in 39 attempts, and you’ve got an MVP season. It’s also worth noting that Wright hit like a house afire down the stretch (.394 AVG/.516 OBP/.657 SLG in August and .352 AVG/.432 OBP/.602 SLG in September/October), even as the rest of the team fell apart.”
…you can certainly make a valid argument for wright, no doubt about it, but as brandon eddy mentioned earlier, the images of the mets falling apart down the stretch had to be looming in the writer’s minds when filling out their ballots. meaningless award in the whole scheme of things anyway. everyone associated with the mets knows how important wright is to this team…





