Comments on: Buzz: Santana wants Zito-Money

By: 4JoeOrsulak

4JoeOrsulak — Sat, 24 Nov 2007 18:55:40 +0000

I’m afraid gowrightgo has a point. Mike and the Dog for instance, have never seemed all that complimentary or concerned with anything Afro-American. They seem to have a tendency to slam any black person with attitude f any kind, though this is only an impression. I’ve got no hard evidence right now.

Castro was accused of rape also (the serious kind). I believe charges were dropped. When you’re a high-profile individual, you become a target. I didn’t hear of anybody paying anyone off to shut up his accuser. It’s quite possible that the charges had no merit.

I think Milz is from Florida. In NY, the age of consent is (I believe) 16. I don’t know what it is in Florida.

By: just-mlb

just-mlb — Sat, 24 Nov 2007 18:45:57 +0000

I wouldn’t want Haren…much rather have Garza, esp since he will only cost us Gomez and a couple of B-level prospects….

i dont care what anyone says, Santana is gonna test the free-agent market no matter what, no sense trading for him…

Haren is a free-agent in 2 years….so basically the same thing applies to him too…

IF ( big IF ) the mets can get one of those other young studs…I’d much rather spend our prospects on proven YOUNG talent that isnt going to bolt in a couple of years…thats the ONLY way I can see trading our prospects or Milledge

By: BSMITTYFDNY

BSMITTYFDNY — Sat, 24 Nov 2007 17:54:00 +0000

In this post Callis is quoted that the Mets can have Haren for a package of Milledge, Heilman, and Mulvey. I realize many “experts” through out deals like they are factual but for the sake of argument would any of you pull the trigger on that deal if possible? Haren is a stud but Beane must know something to want to get rid of him right? Milledge is tough to give up as well as Heilman if we dont have a suitable replacement, and as for Mulvey who knows really. It wouldnt be my favorite idea to get a starter, especially that I dont consider Haren an ace but I think I might do it. You guys?

By: TilMetsDoUsPart

TilMetsDoUsPart — Sat, 24 Nov 2007 17:34:39 +0000

Our best players of value are outfielders. No deal can get done without them, really.

By: BSMITTYFDNY

BSMITTYFDNY — Sat, 24 Nov 2007 16:15:33 +0000

245 posts! Think Santana is a hot topic? Wow!

By: gowrightgo

gowrightgo — Sat, 24 Nov 2007 16:11:02 +0000

Its cool dude. I have at least one typo per reply. Usually because I type slower than I think so one is further behind than the other

By: gowrightgo

gowrightgo — Sat, 24 Nov 2007 15:20:04 +0000

Doc and straw were good house n-ggers right? Played the corporate role of clean guys up until both ended up in jail and on drugs or both.

I loved em both but frankly, they should have been reviled and Milledge has nothing but a clean slate. Statutory rape is a joke. It is not raping in the sense of what guys do 20 yr for. It is having sex with a minor when you are an adult. Not forced sex.

Who cares if you liked a couple of black guys on the 86 team. 20 yrs later….you sound like you are pushing to remove Milledge just because of some crap read in the paper about how he upstages this guy, wont be hazed by vets, slaps hi fives in between innings after hitting his first hr and upsets the competition, stories of stat rape in his long ago past, Rap album, corn rows, etc. Just let the kid be and develop. you can not like him because he can’t hit a slider yet but not because he is all of the other stuff above bc all of that is opinion shaping by media guys who dont like him bc he is black or at least bc he wont take sht from them

By: BSMITTYFDNY

BSMITTYFDNY — Sat, 24 Nov 2007 15:19:24 +0000

I would rather see “B”. I dont want to give up Milledge. I want to keep him in RF. Plus Bedard may be a better option than Santana because he is younger and cheaper. If we could possibly Give the O’s someone other than Gomez then we can still do a Gomez for Garza deal with the Twins. Then we Have Bedard AND Garza. That makes the most sense to me.

By: gowrightgo

gowrightgo — Sat, 24 Nov 2007 15:13:55 +0000

Nice to see you and Kidderek are trolling around with your white hoods on. Glad you found each other. HAve fun bashing the black guys “tude”

By: gowrightgo

gowrightgo — Sat, 24 Nov 2007 15:11:26 +0000

Kidderek. YOu guys are total fools. YOu know what statutory rape actually is?? By the way he was not convicted of it. Charges were eventually dropped.

Statutory rape is essentially some form of sex with a minor by someone not considered a minor. Hence, anyone under the age of 17 having somekind of sex with someone over 17 makes it a case.

Thats right….a senior in high school hence can not get a blow job from a junior in high school without breaking this law. Pretty dumb