<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Note: Beltran Has Full No-Trade</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.metsblog.com/2007/11/28/note-beltran-has-full-no-trade/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2007/11/28/note-beltran-has-full-no-trade/</link>
	<description>MetsBlog.com features the latest Mets rumors, player movement, and news circulating around the Internet, as well as Mets related insights and opinions by Matthew Cerrone and his team of guest bloggers.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 05:48:15 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jdon</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2007/11/28/note-beltran-has-full-no-trade/#comment-48590</link>
		<dc:creator>jdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 23:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2007/11/28/note-beltran-has-full-no-trade/#comment-48590</guid>
		<description>I know,  He kept saying that the Twins wanted proven players.  Well, Melky is a proven mediocriity and Hughes is a proven inconsistency.  I seriously doubt the Twins are going to point to these two three years from now and say:  &quot;See what we got for Santana?&quot;  they might make this trade two minutes before the trade deadline, but not now.  I fI am the Twins I am saqying Cano or Chamberlain.  Apparently they don&#039;t want Cano, and Chamberlain is no way.  Maybe the Mets do have a shot.  If they do, Omar will definitely overpay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know,  He kept saying that the Twins wanted proven players.  Well, Melky is a proven mediocriity and Hughes is a proven inconsistency.  I seriously doubt the Twins are going to point to these two three years from now and say:  &#8220;See what we got for Santana?&#8221;  they might make this trade two minutes before the trade deadline, but not now.  I fI am the Twins I am saqying Cano or Chamberlain.  Apparently they don&#8217;t want Cano, and Chamberlain is no way.  Maybe the Mets do have a shot.  If they do, Omar will definitely overpay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave27</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2007/11/28/note-beltran-has-full-no-trade/#comment-48572</link>
		<dc:creator>dave27</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 22:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2007/11/28/note-beltran-has-full-no-trade/#comment-48572</guid>
		<description>Ian Kennedy is bascially Brian Bannister with the Yankee hype machine.

Joba and Kennedy didn&#039;t exist in their system a year ago and now they are gods.  Hughes projects to a #3 starter for most scouts, and Cabrera is a 5th OF.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ian Kennedy is bascially Brian Bannister with the Yankee hype machine.</p>
<p>Joba and Kennedy didn&#8217;t exist in their system a year ago and now they are gods.  Hughes projects to a #3 starter for most scouts, and Cabrera is a 5th OF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BiggieSmalls</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2007/11/28/note-beltran-has-full-no-trade/#comment-48568</link>
		<dc:creator>BiggieSmalls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 22:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2007/11/28/note-beltran-has-full-no-trade/#comment-48568</guid>
		<description>not only that.. but CANO has like 6 months more service than Melky.. they are at - basically - the same salary level..

dont want Cano because they cant afford him is a completely moronic statement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not only that.. but CANO has like 6 months more service than Melky.. they are at &#8211; basically &#8211; the same salary level..</p>
<p>dont want Cano because they cant afford him is a completely moronic statement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coreyschucky</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2007/11/28/note-beltran-has-full-no-trade/#comment-48528</link>
		<dc:creator>coreyschucky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 21:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2007/11/28/note-beltran-has-full-no-trade/#comment-48528</guid>
		<description>If there is any truth to the reported near close deal between the Twins and Devil Rays the Mets will have no shot at getting Santana.  The Twins will fill there need in the OF and the Mets don&#039;t have the pitching prospects that the Dodgers, Yankees, Angels or Red Sox have.  

Reported Deal That&#039;s Close from MLB Trade Rumors:

Twins Get:  Delmon Young, Brendan Harris &amp; Jason Pridie
DRays Get:  Matt Garza, Juan Rincon &amp; Jason Bartlett</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there is any truth to the reported near close deal between the Twins and Devil Rays the Mets will have no shot at getting Santana.  The Twins will fill there need in the OF and the Mets don&#8217;t have the pitching prospects that the Dodgers, Yankees, Angels or Red Sox have.  </p>
<p>Reported Deal That&#8217;s Close from MLB Trade Rumors:</p>
<p>Twins Get:  Delmon Young, Brendan Harris &amp; Jason Pridie<br />
DRays Get:  Matt Garza, Juan Rincon &amp; Jason Bartlett</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: franco45</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2007/11/28/note-beltran-has-full-no-trade/#comment-48511</link>
		<dc:creator>franco45</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 20:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2007/11/28/note-beltran-has-full-no-trade/#comment-48511</guid>
		<description>But they get people riled up, and that&#039;s what makes a call-in show great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But they get people riled up, and that&#8217;s what makes a call-in show great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hotrodkanehl</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2007/11/28/note-beltran-has-full-no-trade/#comment-48506</link>
		<dc:creator>hotrodkanehl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 19:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2007/11/28/note-beltran-has-full-no-trade/#comment-48506</guid>
		<description>Jim Callis of BP has a Q &amp; A going now with some thoughtful takes on frontline starters&#039; trades:

Jason (NJ): Am I the only one who thinks Hughes, Cabrera and Jackson is a weak offer for Santana. I think Melky is WAY over rated by some of these writers. If I am the Twins GM, I ask for Hughes and Cano, plus a lesser guy. Whats your opinion? 

 Jim Callis: (2:13 PM ET ) I don&#039;t think Cabrera is anything special, but that&#039;s not a horribly weak offer. I love Philip Hughes. I don&#039;t think the Yankees will part with Cano, so if I&#039;m the Twins, maybe I counter with Hughes, Cabrera, Tabata (or Jackson if I can&#039;t get more than Tabata) plus Ian Kennedy. 

Anthony (Brooklyn NY): Ian Kennedy; Is he legit or product of Yankee hype? Would the Twins accept him in a deal instead of Phil Hughes? 

 Jim Callis: (2:15 PM ET ) Some of each. Kennedy&#039;s stuff is nothing special, but he pitches above his stuff. He can become a No. 3 pitcher, but he&#039;s not budding Mike Mussina. I think the Twins would be happy to have him, but not as the centerpiece of a Santana deal. He&#039;s not that good. 


Norman, Putney, VT: Word here (which means rumors) has the Sox offering Buchholtz OR Lester, plus Coco, Lowrie and Masterson OR Bowden for Santana if the Twins grant the 72 hour negotiating window. Too much, too little, just right? 

 Jim Callis: (2:18 PM ET ) I That&#039;s the type of deal that could work for both sides. Boston gets to keep Ellsbury, they can afford to give up a quality young starter with Santana coming in, Lowrie is blocked in Boston right now but ready to play, and the Red Sox could afford to give up Masterson or Bowden in that deal, too. If I&#039;m the Twins, I&#039;d obviously prefer Ellsbury, but that&#039;s an interesting package. Maybe I get Brandon Moss, who&#039;s blocked also, thrown in as well. 

Mike(NY): Dan Haren and Calero for Gomez, Guerra, and Mulvey. Is that a good trade offer? 

 Jim Callis: (2:21 PM ET ) Good for the Mets. If I&#039;m the A&#039;s, I want more than that. I&#039;m not sure how many great chips New York has to play with. I love Milledge&#039;s talent, hate the makeup. I&#039;m not as big a fan of Pelfrey, Humber and Gomez as others might be. I just don&#039;t see enough enticing pieces to pull off a blockbuster. 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dave (South Bend): Is Mulvey, Pelfrey, and Milledge enough for Haren? Please say no. What about Blanton? 

 Jim Callis: (2:23 PM ET ) I&#039;d still rather have Haren. But you know what, I suspect we&#039;re going to see a deal that involves sending Milledge to Oakland and Blanton to New York.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim Callis of BP has a Q &amp; A going now with some thoughtful takes on frontline starters&#8217; trades:</p>
<p>Jason (NJ): Am I the only one who thinks Hughes, Cabrera and Jackson is a weak offer for Santana. I think Melky is WAY over rated by some of these writers. If I am the Twins GM, I ask for Hughes and Cano, plus a lesser guy. Whats your opinion? </p>
<p> Jim Callis: (2:13 PM ET ) I don&#8217;t think Cabrera is anything special, but that&#8217;s not a horribly weak offer. I love Philip Hughes. I don&#8217;t think the Yankees will part with Cano, so if I&#8217;m the Twins, maybe I counter with Hughes, Cabrera, Tabata (or Jackson if I can&#8217;t get more than Tabata) plus Ian Kennedy. </p>
<p>Anthony (Brooklyn NY): Ian Kennedy; Is he legit or product of Yankee hype? Would the Twins accept him in a deal instead of Phil Hughes? </p>
<p> Jim Callis: (2:15 PM ET ) Some of each. Kennedy&#8217;s stuff is nothing special, but he pitches above his stuff. He can become a No. 3 pitcher, but he&#8217;s not budding Mike Mussina. I think the Twins would be happy to have him, but not as the centerpiece of a Santana deal. He&#8217;s not that good. </p>
<p>Norman, Putney, VT: Word here (which means rumors) has the Sox offering Buchholtz OR Lester, plus Coco, Lowrie and Masterson OR Bowden for Santana if the Twins grant the 72 hour negotiating window. Too much, too little, just right? </p>
<p> Jim Callis: (2:18 PM ET ) I That&#8217;s the type of deal that could work for both sides. Boston gets to keep Ellsbury, they can afford to give up a quality young starter with Santana coming in, Lowrie is blocked in Boston right now but ready to play, and the Red Sox could afford to give up Masterson or Bowden in that deal, too. If I&#8217;m the Twins, I&#8217;d obviously prefer Ellsbury, but that&#8217;s an interesting package. Maybe I get Brandon Moss, who&#8217;s blocked also, thrown in as well. </p>
<p>Mike(NY): Dan Haren and Calero for Gomez, Guerra, and Mulvey. Is that a good trade offer? </p>
<p> Jim Callis: (2:21 PM ET ) Good for the Mets. If I&#8217;m the A&#8217;s, I want more than that. I&#8217;m not sure how many great chips New York has to play with. I love Milledge&#8217;s talent, hate the makeup. I&#8217;m not as big a fan of Pelfrey, Humber and Gomez as others might be. I just don&#8217;t see enough enticing pieces to pull off a blockbuster. </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
Dave (South Bend): Is Mulvey, Pelfrey, and Milledge enough for Haren? Please say no. What about Blanton? </p>
<p> Jim Callis: (2:23 PM ET ) I&#8217;d still rather have Haren. But you know what, I suspect we&#8217;re going to see a deal that involves sending Milledge to Oakland and Blanton to New York.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thisisit</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2007/11/28/note-beltran-has-full-no-trade/#comment-48504</link>
		<dc:creator>thisisit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 19:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2007/11/28/note-beltran-has-full-no-trade/#comment-48504</guid>
		<description>The Mets need to make a trade similar to the ones the Celtics and T-Wolves made for Garnett.  4-1 or 5-1.

Additionally, fans of all teams for some crazy reason have an irrational notion that their teams young propsects or players will all be great.  Reality check - most are busts or avg at best.

Look at a Celtics fan forum or blog before and right after the Allen and Garnett trades. 2/3&#039;s of the entries were bemoaning the fact they lost 4-5 young players who were the future of the franchise.  Look at what their saying now after an 11-1 start.

Pelfrey - at best a #3 or perhaps like Izzy
Humber - who knows already had elbow surgery 
Milledge - Gilkey?
Gomez - no bat yet
Fmart - ??
Gotay - avg at best
J. Smith - might become Bradford clone
Mulvey - who knows

Even if one of the group pans out to be an allstar -- don&#039;t you think its worth it for a perennial Cy Young winner an ace. I would easily give up 3-4 or maybe even 5 of those players for Johan.  Depth - you can get their production at this stage from a a journey man FA. Worry about 4 years from now in 4 years.

My deal ---- (Option A) Maine or Perez, Gomez  and choice of 1 of (Pelfrey, Humber, FMart, Gotay)  or (Option B) Milledge, Gomez, and choice of 2 of (Pelfrey, Humber, J. Smith, Mulvey, Kunz, Gotay)

Rotation for 08

(A)
Santana
Pedro
Maine or Perez
Duque
FA  or (Humber, Pelfrey)

(B)
Santana
Pedro
Maine
Perez
Duque

I prefer option (B).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Mets need to make a trade similar to the ones the Celtics and T-Wolves made for Garnett.  4-1 or 5-1.</p>
<p>Additionally, fans of all teams for some crazy reason have an irrational notion that their teams young propsects or players will all be great.  Reality check &#8211; most are busts or avg at best.</p>
<p>Look at a Celtics fan forum or blog before and right after the Allen and Garnett trades. 2/3&#8217;s of the entries were bemoaning the fact they lost 4-5 young players who were the future of the franchise.  Look at what their saying now after an 11-1 start.</p>
<p>Pelfrey &#8211; at best a #3 or perhaps like Izzy<br />
Humber &#8211; who knows already had elbow surgery<br />
Milledge &#8211; Gilkey?<br />
Gomez &#8211; no bat yet<br />
Fmart &#8211; ??<br />
Gotay &#8211; avg at best<br />
J. Smith &#8211; might become Bradford clone<br />
Mulvey &#8211; who knows</p>
<p>Even if one of the group pans out to be an allstar &#8212; don&#8217;t you think its worth it for a perennial Cy Young winner an ace. I would easily give up 3-4 or maybe even 5 of those players for Johan.  Depth &#8211; you can get their production at this stage from a a journey man FA. Worry about 4 years from now in 4 years.</p>
<p>My deal &#8212;- (Option A) Maine or Perez, Gomez  and choice of 1 of (Pelfrey, Humber, FMart, Gotay)  or (Option B) Milledge, Gomez, and choice of 2 of (Pelfrey, Humber, J. Smith, Mulvey, Kunz, Gotay)</p>
<p>Rotation for 08</p>
<p>(A)<br />
Santana<br />
Pedro<br />
Maine or Perez<br />
Duque<br />
FA  or (Humber, Pelfrey)</p>
<p>(B)<br />
Santana<br />
Pedro<br />
Maine<br />
Perez<br />
Duque</p>
<p>I prefer option (B).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: keystonetom</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2007/11/28/note-beltran-has-full-no-trade/#comment-48502</link>
		<dc:creator>keystonetom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 19:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2007/11/28/note-beltran-has-full-no-trade/#comment-48502</guid>
		<description>They sure are a tired act.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They sure are a tired act.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zen</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2007/11/28/note-beltran-has-full-no-trade/#comment-48497</link>
		<dc:creator>zen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 19:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2007/11/28/note-beltran-has-full-no-trade/#comment-48497</guid>
		<description>for the package and cash required to get santana it would be much wiser to trade for haren then repair the bullpen by trading for joe nathan who is available according to foxsports:

http://www.fannation.com/truth_and_rumors/view/28615

pedro
haren
maine
perez
duque

wagner
nathan
heilman
sanchez
feliciano
sosa/show

that&#039;s a solid pitching staff. they&#039;d need to add a right-field bat though as milledge and gomez will be gone in trades.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for the package and cash required to get santana it would be much wiser to trade for haren then repair the bullpen by trading for joe nathan who is available according to foxsports:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fannation.com/truth_and_rumors/view/28615" rel="nofollow">http://www.fannation.com/truth_and_rumors/view/28615</a></p>
<p>pedro<br />
haren<br />
maine<br />
perez<br />
duque</p>
<p>wagner<br />
nathan<br />
heilman<br />
sanchez<br />
feliciano<br />
sosa/show</p>
<p>that&#8217;s a solid pitching staff. they&#8217;d need to add a right-field bat though as milledge and gomez will be gone in trades.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: General Millz</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2007/11/28/note-beltran-has-full-no-trade/#comment-48493</link>
		<dc:creator>General Millz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 19:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2007/11/28/note-beltran-has-full-no-trade/#comment-48493</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t mind listening to Mets game on a network that didn&#039;t employ these two morons.  Whether that means they leave or the Mets leave, I&#039;d be on board...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t mind listening to Mets game on a network that didn&#8217;t employ these two morons.  Whether that means they leave or the Mets leave, I&#8217;d be on board&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.118 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2009-11-08 06:46:16 -->
