Jordan Zakarin

Buzz: Mets Inquire on Burnett
By Jordan Zakarin - Dec 5, 2007 3:03 am

According to Jayson Stark, at ESPN.com, the Mets have inquired about Blue Jays RHP A.J. Burnett.

Burnett, who is certainly talented, but often injured, can opt out of his five-year, $55 million contract after the 2008 season.

In 25 starts for Toronto in 2007, he was 10-8 with a 3.75 ERA.

Burnett was originally drafted by the Mets in the eighth round of the 1995 amateur draft, before being sent to Florida in exchange for Al Leiter following the Miami’s 1997 World Series victory.

RSS feed | Trackback URI

85 Comments »

Comment by Wyoming Met
2007-12-05 01:59:16

Better than no one I guess. Seems more and more the Mets aint gettin’ one of the premier guys. Might as well be Burnett. He isnt half bad.

Comment by plummetdown
2007-12-05 02:01:24

ehh you know he can opt out of his contract after this year.

and his agent is scott boras.

SO BASICALLY WE GIVE UP THE FARM AND GET THIS GUY.

and he opts out after this year. GREAT IDEA OMAR.

GEEZ

Comment by jayhorowitz
2007-12-05 02:26:28

If he opts out we can still collect 2 picks if we offer him arb?

1) just sign silva already
2) sign andruw jones for right field
3) sign colon with incentive laden deal, or move heilman to rotation
4) trade spare parts for relief (church, el duque, gotay)
5) keep our young guys for one more year in the minors and let them build up there reps again.

rotaton:
pedro
maine
perez
silva
colon/ or even heilman

Backups:
pelfrey
humber
mulvey

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by squad
2007-12-05 09:12:59

If we want to upgrade the staff for ‘08, we may need to go down the riskier road of someone like Burnett.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by plummetdown
2007-12-05 02:03:21

oo yea forgot. he’s injury prone.

so if he gets injured he won’t activate his opt out clause.

and mets are stuck with him for a few years.

but if he pitches well…..mets held out for ransom from scott boras….

i can see why blue jays would want to trade this guy. =/

 
Comment by mr_met
2007-12-05 02:06:31

wyoming needs a baseball team

Comment by Wyoming Met
2007-12-05 02:13:05

You need a brain.

Did you read my post? We aint gettin Santana, we aint gettin Bedard, we aint gettin Haren.

Is Burnett worse then anyone other than the 3 I mentioned? Didnt think so.

Dont be an ass.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by mr_met
2007-12-05 02:19:57

i wasn’t really mocking or being sarcastic on your idea… i just saw your name and wanted to mess around… i didn’t even read your post… sorry

 
Comment by mikey_FF
2007-12-05 08:04:37

Dang. People are getting pretty tense around here, huh?

 
Comment by kevin2elster21
2007-12-05 08:29:04

That time of the month.

 
Comment by dannyb
2007-12-05 08:44:51

I look at it this way. Even if we do nothing, we have already improved over the Marlins for next year. I say to stay the course. Won’t finish last at least.

What are they thinking with that deal? I saw Miller pitch. Looks like he can be good….but Dontrelle and Cabrera in the same deal? I think they could have gotten more fore each, unless Dontrelle’s value was THAT low.

So, at least we’re better than the fish.

 
Comment by kevin2elster21
2007-12-05 09:14:40

KUDOS for using your brain!!!

We are already a better team than last year’s team.

Church > Green, although L-Millz is best of the bunch.
Schneider/Castro = LoDuca
Pedro >>>>> Glavine
08 Humber/Pelf/Gomez > 07 Humber/Pelf/Gomez
El Duque = El Duque (rubber arm, besides what’s the difference between a 55yo pitcher and 56yo pitcher?)

Phils made some tweaks, but we won 88 games last year, and we heavily underperformed. Let’s not go crazy and trade our prospects when they’re heavily undervalued.

 
Comment by stickguy
2007-12-05 09:16:58

you nailed it, and even put it in bold!

 
Comment by dannyb
2007-12-05 09:21:35

It’s true. Let the kids go out and play…shock the world (except for the people that post on Metsblog and Omar), then give the finger to every other GM and scout that comes knocking next year.

 
Comment by Blue_n_Orange
2007-12-05 10:27:34

First off

Church=Green (he’s just younger)

Second:

Schneider & Castro will not be playing at the same time. It’s not like they’re going to merge to form Schneitro. So that means on days where Scneider starts you shouldn’t expect too much offense from the catching position. Also, while Lo Duca could be considered a #2 hitter Schneider is strictly a #8.

Third:

The Mest would be best off letting Pelfrey and Humber working their stuff out in the minors next year. Rushing our prospects is part of the reason we’re in the situation we’re in.

 
Comment by dannyb
2007-12-05 12:24:08

Haha…Schneitro. You know what he meant. Schneider’s defense is a major upgrade over what we had last year. Teams exploited LoDuca’s Piazza-esque arm and ran all over him last year. Castro still has the stick he had last year unless he catches Delgado-itis. On days where you figure to need a little offense, you can start Castro. When you face a running team, start Schneider. Still love the Schneitro comment.

I completely agree about Ryan Church being just as good as Green, but Milledge probably would have been the best option. Why not give the kid a legitimate shot? He never had the chance he deserved here.

I agree with you about Humber, but Pelfrey is definitely ready. He took major lumps last year, but sending him down to start the season would be psychologically disasterous. He definitely has the stuff, it’s just a matter of commanding his pitches.

 
Comment by Blue_n_Orange
2007-12-05 14:42:46

Yeah, you’re right. I just couldn’t resist the Schneitro thing ;)

 
 
 
Comment by ExileInLA
2007-12-05 02:46:08

Toronto needs a short man from the pen - the Mets don’t match up there. They would also need a starter, if they send us Burnett, unless they get one of SF’s young arms for Rios in which case they need an OF, and might consider a trade built around Gomez.

If (BIG if) Omar pulls that off, then between Pedro, Burnett and Duque, we’ve got 2 pretty good starters for most of the year. Then come Perez & Maine. Then a rookie (Pelfrey, then Humber) and a retread stashed in AAA as #7.. If the older guys stay healthy, do nothing at July 31; if the older guys are hurting, and the rookies don’t step up, give Mulvey a chance.

 
Comment by kevin2elster21
2007-12-05 08:51:26

wrong wrong wrong

better to stay pat and make a move at the trade deadline than to do something rash.

 
 
Comment by jayhorowitz
2007-12-05 01:59:37

Maybe a package of pelfrey, heilman and church gets it done?

 
Comment by The Glider
2007-12-05 02:02:04

I hope less than that. The guy gets injured all the time and he can opt out after one year with the Mets.

I almost would rather go with Heilman in the rotation.

Comment by kevin2elster21
2007-12-05 08:52:36

Heilman deserves a shot for crying out loud. We may have missed the boat on him being a starter now, but it’s still worth shot.

Comment by squad
2007-12-05 09:16:01

I agree. I made this argument two years ago. I don’t care what Minaya or anyone else says… you can find relief pitching anywhere. Even if Heilman isn’t an ace, if he can give us competent innings then he is more valuable in the rotation. Guys like Kyle Lohse are looking for four year deals. You mean to tell me Heilman can’t be as good as Kyle Lohse.

And worst case scenario, he bombs. At that point, he should finally accept his career path is as a reliever, and he’ll happily return to a role he has thrived in.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by ugbmets21
2007-12-05 02:04:04

WHAT ABOUT SNELL?

get nady and snell for pelf, heilman and church. they want to dump nady bc of wht he will b making.

LETZZZZ GO!

any thoughts?

Comment by Bench5urvivor
2007-12-05 08:05:20

yeah, but Snell is still young, talented, and under control for a few years which EQUALS gonna cost more than that offer

 
Comment by The Dotel Motel
2007-12-05 08:59:43

I have been screaming for the Mets to get Snell since the summer. But from what I read yesterday on a Pirates blog (BUCCO BLOG or something like that) the new Pirates GM will listen to offers for Snell and/or Gorzellany but that - and I quote - he is “asking for the General Managers first born in return”. In other words like every other pitcher available the asking price is enormous.

 
 
Comment by JR.
2007-12-05 02:06:35

I watched Burnett pitch against the red sox in toronto this september…when healthy this guy has unbelievable stuff…

if he could stay healthy, i would be ecstatic to have him as a met…if he can stay healthy.

Comment by kevin2elster21
2007-12-05 08:53:50

Burnett is an enigma. He’s your typical talented arms who can’t put together a whole game consistently. He will never have more than one season of 15+ wins. Nostradamus has spoken.

Comment by napes22
2007-12-05 09:22:32

Any pitcher that can throw a no hitter, yet walk 9 guys has some major flaws. I feel like with Burnett we’d be getting another Ollie.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by metsftw
2007-12-05 11:50:51

no, he’s twice the pitcher ollie could ever hope to be.

 
 
 
 
Comment by firemetmanagement
2007-12-05 02:08:04

Nady is garbage. Been there, done that. He is a .260 hitter that never gets a hit when it counts. And he is a slug in the Outfield.

Pass.

Comment by kevin2elster21
2007-12-05 08:54:39

Converted from the infield. He’s ok, but we’re better off focusing our attention elsewhere.

 
 
Comment by mr_met
2007-12-05 02:08:51

can we just pray that pelfrey and humber step up and win 20 each

Comment by mr_met
2007-12-05 02:10:34

ok, i just saw it. it sounded less pathetic in my head initially

Comment by dannyb
2007-12-05 08:47:20

Not sure if Humber will even win 20 games in his career as a Met. Pelfrey is another story. I really think this can be a breakout year.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by kevin2elster21
2007-12-05 08:57:03

“Not sure if Humber will even win 20 games in his career as a Met. ”

I was with you until you said ‘a Met,’ I’m not sure he can win 20 in his career.

“Pelfrey is another story. I really think this can be a breakout year.”

What makes you think that?

 
Comment by squad
2007-12-05 09:20:09

He’s only 24, still has a dominating fastball with plus sink, and he has a nice fluid, repeatable motion. He was rushed to the bigs and finally has some professional experience under his belt.

Also, Bedard, Haren, and even Snell… all of these pitchers we are lusting after didn’t really emerge until 24+. Not saying it’s a sure thing, but it’s like the 3rd year receive in the NFL. You give a guy at least until age 24/25 to see if he can make it so long as he still has the stuff.

I mean, look at Maine. It took him a few years to figure it out.