Comments on: Poll: Should the Mets have Signed Zito http://www.metsblog.com/2007/12/06/poll-should-the-mets-have-signed-zito/ Latest Mets News, Links, Rumors and Opinion Fri, 04 Feb 2011 21:22:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: blond free http://www.metsblog.com/2007/12/06/poll-should-the-mets-have-signed-zito/#comment-92816 blond free Sat, 02 Feb 2008 15:46:06 +0000 http://www.metsblog.com/2007/12/06/poll-should-the-mets-have-signed-zito/#comment-92816 <strong>blond free...</strong> Great post!!... blond free…

Great post!!…

]]> By: jerseymetsfan http://www.metsblog.com/2007/12/06/poll-should-the-mets-have-signed-zito/#comment-58657 jerseymetsfan Thu, 06 Dec 2007 21:26:09 +0000 http://www.metsblog.com/2007/12/06/poll-should-the-mets-have-signed-zito/#comment-58657 I don't think they should have signed zito, but lilly and mench would have been fair signings, especially when you look at this years FA pitchers, and the $$ they are going to get. also i didn't like trading away bannister last year and like even less now. I don’t think they should have signed zito, but lilly and mench would have been fair signings, especially when you look at this years FA pitchers, and the $$ they are going to get. also i didn’t like trading away bannister last year and like even less now.

]]> By: Achilles400 http://www.metsblog.com/2007/12/06/poll-should-the-mets-have-signed-zito/#comment-58123 Achilles400 Thu, 06 Dec 2007 16:43:28 +0000 http://www.metsblog.com/2007/12/06/poll-should-the-mets-have-signed-zito/#comment-58123 Agees Catch right at the top says it all about this poll. Inane. Agees Catch right at the top says it all about this poll. Inane.

]]> By: Ken Dynamo http://www.metsblog.com/2007/12/06/poll-should-the-mets-have-signed-zito/#comment-58098 Ken Dynamo Thu, 06 Dec 2007 16:27:45 +0000 http://www.metsblog.com/2007/12/06/poll-should-the-mets-have-signed-zito/#comment-58098 why shouldnt the marlins' FO be allowed to do whatever they want with the team? its theirs. i didnt see anyone complain when the dealt us delgado and lo duca for peanuts. well, until this year anyway. why shouldnt the marlins’ FO be allowed to do whatever they want with the team? its theirs. i didnt see anyone complain when the dealt us delgado and lo duca for peanuts. well, until this year anyway.

]]> By: Ken Dynamo http://www.metsblog.com/2007/12/06/poll-should-the-mets-have-signed-zito/#comment-58090 Ken Dynamo Thu, 06 Dec 2007 16:25:02 +0000 http://www.metsblog.com/2007/12/06/poll-should-the-mets-have-signed-zito/#comment-58090 i would take just about any wager on zito having a 'big time bounce back' year in 08. nothing i've seen indicates he is substantially better than the way he pitched this year. i would take just about any wager on zito having a ‘big time bounce back’ year in 08. nothing i’ve seen indicates he is substantially better than the way he pitched this year.

]]> By: Ken Dynamo http://www.metsblog.com/2007/12/06/poll-should-the-mets-have-signed-zito/#comment-58088 Ken Dynamo Thu, 06 Dec 2007 16:23:19 +0000 http://www.metsblog.com/2007/12/06/poll-should-the-mets-have-signed-zito/#comment-58088 zito would have been better because the mets had one of the best defenses in the majors last year. #2 in the majors according to Dewan's +/-, or something close to that. that contract still sucks tho. even if zito had 17 wins and 3.5 era i would still be skeptical of the judgment of the whole deal. unless zito improves this contract is going to look like one of the all time turds. zito would have been better because the mets had one of the best defenses in the majors last year. #2 in the majors according to Dewan’s +/-, or something close to that.

that contract still sucks tho. even if zito had 17 wins and 3.5 era i would still be skeptical of the judgment of the whole deal. unless zito improves this contract is going to look like one of the all time turds.

]]> By: 1-18-31-7 http://www.metsblog.com/2007/12/06/poll-should-the-mets-have-signed-zito/#comment-58082 1-18-31-7 Thu, 06 Dec 2007 16:20:26 +0000 http://www.metsblog.com/2007/12/06/poll-should-the-mets-have-signed-zito/#comment-58082 without a doubt they should have signed him last year. he might not have been an ace but would have been a whole lot better with a team that can actually score some runs. and he has had a knack of pitching some good games in big spots... without a doubt they should have signed him last year. he might not have been an ace but would have been a whole lot better with a team that can actually score some runs. and he has had a knack of pitching some good games in big spots…

]]> By: stickguy http://www.metsblog.com/2007/12/06/poll-should-the-mets-have-signed-zito/#comment-58035 stickguy Thu, 06 Dec 2007 15:54:46 +0000 http://www.metsblog.com/2007/12/06/poll-should-the-mets-have-signed-zito/#comment-58035 darned if I know. darned if I know.

]]> By: Coolpapabell http://www.metsblog.com/2007/12/06/poll-should-the-mets-have-signed-zito/#comment-58008 Coolpapabell Thu, 06 Dec 2007 15:43:30 +0000 http://www.metsblog.com/2007/12/06/poll-should-the-mets-have-signed-zito/#comment-58008 How do you feel about is declining peripherals? His w/9 are alright, but the biggest problem is that he doesn't k many people and his hits per 9 have been increasing each year. A lot of people saw this coming. Except for Brian Sabean. How do you feel about is declining peripherals? His w/9 are alright, but the biggest problem is that he doesn’t k many people and his hits per 9 have been increasing each year. A lot of people saw this coming.
Except for Brian Sabean.

]]> By: kevin2elster21 http://www.metsblog.com/2007/12/06/poll-should-the-mets-have-signed-zito/#comment-58002 kevin2elster21 Thu, 06 Dec 2007 15:41:34 +0000 http://www.metsblog.com/2007/12/06/poll-should-the-mets-have-signed-zito/#comment-58002 can't give 18 mil to a #5, clubhouse will be filled with resentment, not to mention all the pressure. can’t give 18 mil to a #5, clubhouse will be filled with resentment, not to mention all the pressure.

]]>