SNY.tvBLOG NETWORKSCHEDULESTATSSTANDINGS VIDEO Headlines:

Matthew Cerrone

Read: Naming Rights
By Matthew Cerrone - Jan 3, 2008 12:44 pm

In a report for FoxBusiness.com, Matt Egan takes a closer look at how and why teams sell naming rights to corporations for their news stadiums, such as the Mets have done with Citigroup and Citi Field.

Egan talks about the subject with Yankees COO Lonn Trost, Jeff Knapple of Wasserman Media, and me, Matthew Cerrone of MetsBlog.com, who says…

“I’m far more concerned with what they are doing on the inside of the stadium than the name on the outside.”

i will say this, though, my only issue with naming rights, which i told egan though he did not mention it in the report, is that it would be quite annoying if the name on the stadium changed every other season like it does for some teams…of course, the name will hardly impact whether or not i buy tickets to a game, which is all the team is concerned with i would bet

hmm, $400 million divided by 20 years is $20 million per yearhey, so, assuming Citigroup is still in business next season, how about they kick in a few more million, the Mets trade for Johan Santana and they write Citigroup on his back instead of his last name

…that’s a joke, by the way

73 Responses to “Read: Naming Rights”

  1. napes22 says:

    Johan Citigroup – that has a nice ring to it.

  2. genius says:

    but no money for the likes of arod. tsk tsk…..

    (mets dont need a power bat anyway….3rd place….YAY!!!!)

    • napes22 says:

      Weren’t you attacked on other threads for similar posts? We didn’t have an opportunity to shell out money for AROD because the Yankees resigned him before we had a chance. What other big bat on the market are you talking about?

    • dannyb says:

      A-Rod wanted to be a Yankee. Boras (and Natasha) wanted him to test the waters.

      A-Rod begged Hanky “The Christmas Poo” to take him back. (or that was probably the condition agreed upon between both parties to tell the media to save Hanky some face).

      Mets never had a shot at A-Rod. While I would have liked to make a pitch for him, that’s the reality. Deal with it….YAY!!!

  3. HeBeGB says:

    “…that’s a joke, by the way…”

    you may be joking, but the truth is that Citigroup would essentially be paying Santana’s salary. Met’s get zero now for naming rights, so the $20 Million is ‘found money’. It’s like getting Santana for free.

    • napes22 says:

      Actually that’s an interesting point. Does that mean that Banco Popular paid for Beltran?

      • ravi3 says:

        That would be a true statement if Wilpon wasn’t paying anything for the new park.

        • HeBeGB says:

          I understand…the Citi money is really to help offset the building cost….but, hey, maybe Wilpon would go for it anyway. “Fred, it’s like we’re getting him for free!”

          :-)

          (Birds wont nest below this level)

        • dannyb says:

          Bird








          O <== Poop

    • da burg's greatest mets fan says:

      yea, but the mets also pay nothing for the stadium they are currently in. so basically they are now paying 800 million for the stadium which will be offset by the 400 million that citigroup is paying them.

    • MetLifer says:

      It’s not like getting Santana for free because that’s not all it’s going to cost the Mets. You’re also mortgaging the WHOLE farm. When is everyone going to realize money is not the only issue!

  4. Metsfan980 says:

    I just hope we never adopt the style that the Japanese use.

    The team’s first name is the owning corporations name and not the city that they play in. However, the teams are notorious for spending more on the team than the team brings in, instead relying on their name as advertisement for their other products (mostly railway services and media outlets).

  5. Ken Dynamo says:

    who else things of the southpark bit with the asian guy that is mad at the stupid mongorians for always tearing down his city wall – and then runs a business called city wok and city airlines?

    that’s how i will pronounce citi field – ah, wewcawm to schitty fewwd

    • ravi3 says:

      My FAVORITE episodes…..”Just because I eat rice, and drive rearry rearry srow does not make me a stereotype!”

      “G-damn Mongorians!! Stop tearing down my schitty warr!!!!”

      • points guy says:

        wow.

        i know you’re quoting, but that’s incredibly r4cist for you to re-post it and enjoy it so much.

        • points guy says:

          wow, they filter “r a c i s t?”

          nice one matt!!!

        • ravi3 says:

          want to add a clarification (sort of) but it wont let me

        • ravi3 says:

          namley though individual quotes from south park can be considered r4cist, can the show itself be considered that way, as they poke fun equally at all groups, without showing preference toward any single one?

          Personally, I consider the Simpsons to be worse, as Apu is depicted as a typical Indian stereotype, but that is the only group consistantly made fun of in that sense…Not that I get up in arms about it or anything, but thats a big difference, I think.

        • points guy says:

          Come to think of it, they get Apu pretty badly each time.

        • Ken Dynamo says:

          of course its wacist – thats what makes it funny! its not that mean either. its just talking about an accent. big deal, its not like its a slavery or holocaust joke.

    • OhJay says:

      Damn You Waryy Jones, stop hitting the Barw over my schitty Warwl…

  6. tfc3rid says:

    Citi is having a really difficult time right now, selling out some of their business to Dubai… I would not be shocked to see thdm take an early ‘out’ on this deal with the Mets…

    • da burg's greatest mets fan says:

      my grandfather lost like 40% of his net worht because of citi. i know that he still wants them to keep the naming rights though. (he works for smith barney which is owned by citi)

  7. DAK442 says:

    I noticed this article, like virtually every other on the topic, ignored the fact that the Yankees are receiving a $10 million rent discount from the city specifically so they don’t have sully their new stadium with a corporate name. Yep, you and I (well, we New Yorkers, anyway) are essentially serving as Citibank for the Empire.

    So Lonn Trost (Boy, can you imagine what a dillhole a guy named Lonn Trost is?) can get off his high horse, the way he sniffed “We will not be renaming Yankee Stadium”.

    • VCarver says:

      Both teams are getting significant help from the city/state in terms of tax breaks or subsidies for their new stadiums. I am pretty sure the monies saved will be about equal. You can bet both organizations are keeping an eye on the other to make sure of this.

      However, both teams are essentially paying for their new stadiums out of their own pockets.

      • DAK442 says:

        Yes, both teams are being heavily subsidized. But this particular amount was earmarked for this specific reason, and no similar earmark allowed us to keep the Shea moniker.

        Not that I’m saying I’d turn down $20 mil from a new sponsor. What really grinds my gears is the superior tone this Yankee COO creep takes, the same tone Yankee fans will no doubt take over the next 20 years.

        • VCarver says:

          Dak, you mean the comments by Trost? I just read the article and didn’t find anything he said to be annoying.

          Also, keep in mind the deal for the naming rights was done way before the Yankees got that latest tax break/subsidy. I believe like 2 years ago?

          Frankly, I think what the Yankees are doing is preferable — not selling naming rights to the entire stadium but instead to certain parts of it — like entranceways or common spaces. Why didn’t the Mets do that? I also don’t like it that the Mets cut capacity so much. The Yankees didn’t cut theirs that much and will probably reap additional revenues from the extra seats. Why didn’t the Mets increase capacity instead? I would have liked to see them keep the name Shea Stadium.

        • DAK442 says:

          Trost seemed haughty. “We won’t be renaming Yankee Stadium”. I imagined a sneer.

          I would prefer “Shea”, but $20 mil is tough to turn down.

          I think building a 45K seat stadium is absolutely preposterous. We averaged 48K this past season!

        • VCarver says:

          The stadium capacity issue is a perfect example of why, in many cases, the Yankees make better pure business decisions than the Mets.

          I read some argument that there would be diminishing returns with higher capacity at Citifield because of higher building/maintenance costs. But I just can’t believe that. I think Wilpon sometimes makes the sentimental decision. And he kept the stadium smaller so it would remind him more of Ebbets field. But that’s not a good reason for limiting capacity the way they did. It’s a poor business decision.

  8. points guy says:

    Perfect Sponsor:

    Met Life

  9. rustystaubsillegitmateson says:

    hows about putting a chicos bail bonds advert on their uniforms??

  10. rustystaubsillegitmateson says:

    comeon pointsguy i deserved better than+2 by the way ne1 here thingk that firemetsmanagement is matts evil twin ?? think about it he is matt in bizzaro world plus his mets logo is reversed on his cap
    lets go lupus!!!!

  11. loopenark says:

    When Turner owned the Braves and signed Andy Messersmith, one of the first free agents, he put the word “Channel” above Messersmith on the back of his uni number (which was 17). He was trying to promote WTBS, channel 17, back in the days before the superstation. Kuhn immediately ordered him to change it back to Messersmith.

  12. MetLifer says:

    I have no idea why anyone cares what the stadium is called. If the Mets want to make money off it, fine.. They could call it Met Poop Stadium for all I care!

    • napes22 says:

      Awesome! And when we go to games, we can just say “I’m going to watch a game at ‘The Poop’ “

  13. points guy says:

    What about King Yooz Bin Phar Teen

  14. napes22 says:

    I got an email saying that a distant uncle is the king if nigeria, and he just died. All I have to do is give my bank account info and I get all his riches! Maybe I’ll buy the team!

  15. dannyb says:

    Hey, I got an e-mail like that too. Maybe we’re related. Awesome.

  16. Ken Dynamo says:

    ruh roh – more wacism!