Matthew Cerrone

Buzz: Mets, Front-Runners for Santana?
By Matthew Cerrone - Jan 14, 2008 8:12 am

In yesterday’s Daily News, citing a baseball official, Anthony McCaron wrote that the Mets are pursuing a trade for LHP Johan Santana.

According to the official, “Maybe this week something will heat up. Nothing’s going on right now.”

…well, from what i understand, i wouldn’t say ‘nothing,’ though things are certainly at a slight pause - since, as i pointed out the other day, it’s santana who is in the driver’s seat, not the Twins, Mets, Sox or Yankees…

Nevertheless, in the Boston Globe, Nick Cafardo writes…

“Two general managers told me they believe the Mets are the front-runners for Johan Santana. The reason? They need him most…Of course, both GMs also pointed out that the Yankees or Red Sox are only a phone call away from getting it done.”

According to last Friday’s New York Times, Santana’s agent recently told the Twins that his client would like to have this situation settled before spring training.

However, according to a more recent report from the Associated Press, citing the player’s agent, Santana has never made an official request to be traded before pitchers and catchers are set to meet.

…like i wrote on a few occasions last week, as i understand it, santana wants to know who he will be pitching for before pitchers and catchers report, especially if he’ll be switching leagues like he prefers to do - which is why i believe there will be a conclusion to this story before February, i.e., three weeks or so…nevertheless, i don’t think he’s the kind of guy who will make painful demands on the Twins, at least to the extent that it limits their ability to deal…i mean, he’ll certainly look out for his personal best interests, but there is also a sense of loyalty and respect there for the Twins, as well…

…nevertheless, the Mets have been keeping tabs on the santana situation for quite a while now, and, as i have been writing, they’re currently the only major, pro-active team left in the mix…of course, if the Yankees wake up and decide to make Phil Hughes available tomorrow, then the Yankees will slot in as the front runners…that has yet to happen, though…of course, as a Mets fan, every day that passes, to me, feels like another chance for the Yankees to ruin my day…

78 Responses to “Buzz: Mets, Front-Runners for Santana?”

  1. bobbyv says:

    Not that I dislike being the frontrunner necessarily, but how exactly do we need him most — particularly over the Yankees. How Does Wang, Petite, Mussina and rooks constitute not-need vs. Maine, Ollie, Duke, etc.?

    • Ryn5 says:

      We collapsed pre-postseason instead of in the first round, duh!

    • stickguy says:

      For the Stankers, that is actually a potentially disaster of a rotation, that could easily blow out the bull pen big time.

      Hopefully October will carry over for Wang, who knows about Petite, Mussina is shot, and then 2 very raw rookies?

      And the Mets are the ones that really need him?

      • Cousinjoey says:

        I am glad the prevailing thought is that the Yankees and Red Sox, don’t “need” Santana. That arrogance will keep them (hopefully) out of the Johan sweepstakes. I just hope the longer this whole process drags on, that the Mets could get snakebit by some other team.

      • Nate W. says:

        while I agree that the Yanks kids may not be as great in 2008 as the Yanks seem to think, they have enough back up to get through the season with them.

        Hughes, Kennedy, and Joba give them 6 starters, the odd man out can take innings away from the others, and fill in for the veterans when they get hurt.

        Also they have Karstens, Chase Wright, and Igawa on the 40 man roster to shuttle back and forth from AAA, and they claimed Heath Phillips off waivers who has gone 26-12 the last two years at AAA. That should be more than enough to pick up the slack. They also have Humberto Sanchez coming back from elbow surgery…

        Meanwhile the Mets will have Humber and Jason Vargas backing up thier rotation. All the more case to make the Santana deal.

    • thebaron98 says:

      I agree with what you say about the Yankees being in need of him. But simply put, as stated in other responses, the Yankees made the playoffs. Without another starter, the Mets are likely in the same boat they were in for 2007 - a playoff miss. With Santana, they transform the rotation into a championship caliber one. It is crucial to make this move in my opinion. I am willing to pay the price for a couple of years if it means the Mets can be perrenial contenders from 2005-2012. I believe that of the two big prospects in Gomez and Martinez, one will truly make it. And assuming one makes it, will they be as good at their position as Santana is at his? Not likely.

  2. murpheeee says:

    Yankees rooks (Hughes, Chamberlain) look a lot more like making it in the bigs than the Mets rooks (Pelfrey , Humber)

    Plus Duque generally spends half the season on the treatment table.

    • bobbyv says:

      I like Hughes stuff, but his numbers for the last 3 months of the season looked suspicously similar to Pelf’s. Same with Chamberlin, but his first 2 months were no more impressive than Joe Smith (but for the Skankee hype machine) — and the guy’s never started a big league game! Not to mention that the Yanks track record for patience with starters (and their educated fan base) usually lasts about 23 pitches.

      • bigchart333 says:

        excellent, EXCELLENT points bobby V

      • napes22 says:

        Bottom line is the Yankees prospects were more hyped, so their success no matter how marginal (cough Hughes) will be overblown when compared to a Joe Smith or Mike Pelfrey. If you remember there were a good two starts in a row last year where was outstanding.

        Smith lost his countrol in the end of the year - lets hope it was just a fatigue thing and not mental - we don’t need Mark Wholers on this team.

      • jspicyn says:

        Hughes and Chamberlain are both much better prospects than Pelfrey and Humber. Hughes is the real deal - he will most certainly be the staff ace within a year or 2 and could even be this year. Chamberlain I see more of as the closer in waiting when Mo leaves but I guess they like him starting. Either way I’d trade Pelf, Humber for Hughes in a heart beat

    • stickguy says:

      Hughes, if he stays healthy, could be good this year, but rookies his age will still have some growing pains, stamina issues, etc. What happens when he hits August/140 innings (think Maine last year).

      Jaba? Who knows? A guy that had to have arm-babying rules last year, and had injuries issues in the past? Can he pitch 5+ innings every day without a problem?

      I understand that Pedro might not hold together, but frankly, every pitcher in the league is one pitch away from a blown out elbow.

      • metsrule7 says:

        Joba had arm-babying rules because of Joe Torre not because he was an injury risk. Torre has been known to overuse players so they were protecting Joba from Torre not Joba from Joba. When he’s your only reliable set-up man, there’s no doubt that Torre would have called his number almost every night that they were in a close game.

  3. bobbyv says:

    From a public relations standpoint, I agree. Maybe from a clubhouse presence, grit standpoint, I can buy it. Getting Santana would be a huge difference maker; and we haven’t had a #1 like him in years.

    But comparing one teams vs. anothers; The Yanks have twice the salary, new mgr.; Red Sox Worlds Series; Horrible Hank — and think they’re made in the shade with a Sinkerball pitcher who did a Glavine in the post-season; an beyond his primer HGHer, an even further beyond his prime Mussina — and rooks? This should be amusing.

  4. scottykick says:

    Because Wang, Pettite, Mussina, Hughes, Kennedy (w/ Joba as a possibility) is a lot stronger then Pedro,Maine,O. Perez, El Duque & Pelfry.

    Look at it this way, add Santana to the rotation, and it’s a whole new dynamic. Pedro will then be a dominant #2 starter, Maine would be the best #3 in the NL and Perez & Pelfry would be great back of the rotation guys and El Duque can be moved to long relief, so you can savehis arm and maybe he can be available at full strenght in the playoffs as a possible starter.

    They also need him the most because of the way last season ended and they need something big and positive going into this season. Santana would absolutly be dominant in the NL, especially in a division that has the Marlins and Nats, add the fact he would be pitching in a pitchers park at Shea this season and Citi next.

    The deal needs be be done, but if they can keep Fernando Martinez out of the deal it would be even better, but if it is a deal breaker I would include him.

    • Ryn5 says:

      I’d rather see Pelfrey develop some command and poise pitching out of the bullpen.

      I’ll take Duque’s 3-ish ERA until he gets hurt in June for two months.

      • MealTicket says:

        Right on.

      • stickguy says:

        Agreed. When healthy, he just might be their best SP (or at elast he was for stretches last year).

        Since he is gone after 2008 (please!), they shold get every inning possible out of his arm.

        Guess the question is, do you want to milk him along and bubble wrap him for October 9hasn’t worked yet…) or just use him normally and hope he makes it 1/2 way through the year?

        If Pelfrey is in AAA working on his stuff and command, then ride Duque hard and call up Pelf when he breaks. Not sure what you do if they are both in the rotation.

      • Xavier22 says:

        Exactly. Many posters in here have just assumed El Duque can be/will be slotted to the pen in the event another starter (Santana or otherwise) is added to the Mets. Given how El Duque usually has his worst inning at the beginning of his start, I don’t see that as being a good idea necessarily.

        Whatever happens in the next few weeks, I’d rather see El Duque in the starting rotating (ideally in the 5 spot) in April and Pelfry down in AAA. When El Duque goes on the DL in late May/early June, then Pelfry should be bumped up to the starting rotation.

  5. Go Bro says:

    The “slight pause” in this story is a cause for concern for me. There seemed to be an increasing drum best of attention and comments in the media the end of last week on the Mets moving closer to a deal for Santana….even though Matt kept saying not to get too excited. That said, the Mets are still in it and the Yanks have not publicily changed their mind. From what I gather from Matt now is that if the Yanks decide to include Hughes they may get Santana. I do not think so. I think if the Mets put of the five prospects and agree to a long term contract with Santana , the deal will get done.
    I Omar I trust.

    • HOFMets57 says:

      I felt the same way.

      I do believe the Mets are the front-runners as they are the only ones pro-actively pursuing Santana, but that could all change if Hank decides Hughes could be dealt. If that happens, the Red Sox will slightly increase their offer (I don’t think they’ll include Lester and Ellsbury together, though) and Omar will be forced to include Fernando Martinez. This is what Bill Smith is hoping for but might not get. Let’s all hope the Twins are forced to accept our current offer.

  6. Agee's Catch says:

    Somebody kill me please.

  7. mikey_FF says:

    Hi guys, I’m Bill Murray and this is Groundhog Day.

  8. stickguy says:

    This seems to be when the final push is starting (Hitler marching on Moscow? Given the amount of coverage, it seems like it!)

    So, if any team was waiting back with their big offer (Yanks or Sox, or Mets too), it is just about time.

    But, we should also know soon if their is a mystery team lying in the weeds, waiting to swoop in at the last minute. No idea who. Angels? Dodgers? Someone shocking like the Phils or Braves (Braves maybe..).

    As a general rule, if “everyone” in the sports media says something is certain, it probably isn’t. And way too many people have made this a 3 team race

    Just please, get this over with soon so we can move on with our lives!

    I bet the person enjoying this the most is Beane. You know he is just sitting there waiting for Santana to go so he can swoop in and try to rob a team that missed Johan by selling them Blanton for nearly the same price.

    Hey, psychologically the GM already decided to give up a group of players, so maybe they will just send them to Oakland instead (or at least it works like that in baneland).

  9. bigchart333 says:

    we should throw in F-Mart and Heilman and ask them to throw in Nathan. THen when they balk, we can say “well now you know how we feel about throwing in a FIFTH “untouchable” prospect, so just lets hammer this out NOW and be done with it so the fellow Metsbloggers can get back to reading nonsense about John Maine’s Dress, and David Wright buying hot dogs from that softball b*tch”

    • gowrightgo says:

      I’ve said it already a few times….I don’t want Santana. My thoughts are he is on the decline. He is not the reigning Cy Young from the AL and his WHIP and ERA have risen pretty steadily in the last 3 years while his win totals have begun to shrink from the guaranteed 19 - 20 to now 15 last year with 13 losses. He also is starting to give up the long ball pretty regularly.

      While he is still better than any pitcher on the Mets roster and better than many in the NL…he is no longer the top pitcher in the game. With Haren, Webb, Peavy clearly all his equal and others like Hamels, Cain, Lincecum, etc on the rise….I can see buying and paying him a kings ransom coming back to bite us both in the short and long term.

      The problem is the alternatives seem too expensive also in terms of talent. Yet…I think we should spend 2/3rds of the 5 players discussed and get Snell, Lincecum, Cain, or Kazmir and at least we will have pitchers who are rising on the ace charts and are still young enough to grow into their careers.

      Santana has peaked already and while still terrific, he is no longer the best pitcher in either league and is about to get the most money ever paid to a pitcher in the history of the game. Seeing as we are trading for the most expensive pitcher in the game who is no longer the best pitcher in the game….only the best in the NL east, I would pass or at least reduce the trade package from its current iteration. Take out Guerra and Fmart, deliver them Gomez, Pelfrey, Humber and Mulvey. If they need a 5th guy….think guys like Niese or Vineyard rather than Guerra and Fmart.

      If we drop our top 3 most ready pitcher into the deal…..we will need to trade again or possibly look to snare a FA flier on Colon, Jennings or Lohse to give us some support for the obvious DL issues we will have with Duque