Comments on: amLinks: Snuffleupagus, Meters, MySpace

By: just-mlb

just-mlb — Fri, 21 Mar 2008 00:08:24 +0000

the cubs !?!?!?

after ted lilly their rotation is crap…their defense is crap…they still have no 2B…Arasmis can hit but cant field..who is their CF?

next Kruk will say that the Marlins are taking the East

By: gipper913

gipper913 — Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:10:39 +0000

All this kvetching about the ESPN tools ignores the most important part of this post – a reference to Snufleupagus, complete with Matt posting a picture of a Snuffleupagus stuffed toy!

By: Ryn5

Ryn5 — Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:56:24 +0000

Gammons hasn’t had a clue since his brain aneurysm.

By: Metsfan707

Metsfan707 — Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:40:46 +0000

JOHN KRUK IS FAT AND WAS ON STEROIDS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

By: OrangeNBlueSince82

OrangeNBlueSince82 — Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:30:17 +0000

You gotta love Timmy Kurkjian. I met the guy last season at the ESPN Zone before a Mets-Cubs game – the one that was delayed by rain until 10:15 and you could mail your ticket in for any of the games in the TWins series. Anyway, no one knew who he was just sitting near the bar. I turn around and he was right near me so I started to talking baseball and he said if Pedro came back healthy the Mets had a great chance in ‘07. Well, his prediction was wrong but you have love his optimisim. There’s at least one ESPN guy who doesn’t hate the Mets.

By: Steve In Tampa

Steve In Tampa — Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:30:46 +0000

When he was traded to the Yankmees

By: mrose

mrose — Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:12:17 +0000

he said that???

By: BlueTrane

BlueTrane — Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:03:56 +0000

My favorite Kruk moment was when he said Randy Johnson could easily win 30 games a couple years back if he stays healthy…..lol

By: DjDeF

DjDeF — Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:15:53 +0000

The only guy I take seriously on ESPN with regards to baseball is Tim Kurkjan. He seems to be the least biased and is the smartest guy there. It is too bad they do not have him on that often. Other then that Kruk is an absolute tool.

By: metsfan227

metsfan227 — Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:12:49 +0000

What really drves me crazy aout Kruk is when he says the Philles will win the division beause, after Sanatana, the Mets ptching is *questionable.*

HUH? And the Phillies pitching is……? I mean, Cole Hamels is hardly proven. Brett Myers, who knows? After that I can’t even name the rest of their rotation.

If Kruk wants to base his pick on *known pitching* then shouldn’t he pick the Braves?