|
|
|
According to Bart Hubbach in the New York Post, Pedro
Martinez is expected to be out until at least the middle of May, and possibly into June.
…rock on, Nelson Figueroa…stay alert, Claudio Vargas…hi, Orlando Hernandez…
Hubbach also provides a quote or two from Mets GM Omar Minaya regarding Martinez’s progress and the team’s overall performance.



I keep forgeting about Elduque for some reason. I have no idea why
When is he supposed to be back?
El Duque won’t pitch again in a Mets uniform….and Pedro will come back at the end of June, pitch 2 games and get hurt again.
Lets all move on as a fan base and organization without these 2 guys. They are old and finished, and its foolish to lag on anticipating their returns. Pelfrey and Nelson are now your 4 and 5 guys.
At this point in the game, I don’t even want El Duque or Pedro in the rotation. Let the younger guys solidify the spots.
These 2 have done nothing the last few years but dissapoint, dissapoint, and dissapoint some more. The Mets need to move on without either of them….they will be much better off in the long run.
While I agree with some of your points, you are dead wrong that we will not see him again. He will come back give us a few quality starts and be gone again. That sounds like a bad thing, however we do need the innings. Pelfrey can’t pitch 200 and who knows what Figgy will give us.
You’re right about these guys being old and probably of little use. However, I don’t think El Duque was a total wash last year. He pitched 147 innings with 128 strikeouts vs. 64 walks. And his record was 9-5. It was, however, disappointing to have him hurt at the end of both of the last 2 seasons.
We can move on as a fan base, sure, and we should — anything we get from Pedro or El Duque is gravy. The organization, however, should still try to get as much from them as it can. They shouldn’t rely on them, and they shouldn’t disrupt everyone else’s turn in the rotation multiple times during the year, but Pedro as a spot fifth starter for a couple of months wouldn’t be a bad thing.
You’re best to forget him. He won’t be back - at least not in any serviceable form.
We’re all better off saying “goodbye El Duque” rather than waiting for him to come back and show us what he’s got.
Because you know what he’s got? An injury prone 85 year old’s body and a bunyon that won’t quit. Put those together and that’s recipe for disaster.
the mets signed el duque? nice!
Hopefully Figueroa can make some more quality starts. Better to have a fresh Pedro down the stretch anyway…
I don’t think we will see El Duque much at all this year…but that is merely an opinion. Pelfrey and Figgy will have their chances with Vargas and Armas waiting in Triple A.
met nation is going to have to learn to put both martinez and hernandez on the “way back’ burner. neither one will be back with the team any time soon. disappointing indeed, but that’s the way it is.
these injuries are very frustrating
I love Pedro, always have, but it really is a shame how much of a bust he has been for us–in terms of playing (not in terms of bringing credibility to the franchise, attracting other Latino talent, etc. which I think has been invaluable). It almost seems like the headline “Mets Push Back Pedro’s Return” is a joke at this point…kind of like “El Duque Injures _____; Out for ______.”
The best we can do at this point is let those guys do their usual looooong rehab and get healthy, while hoping for the best from Figgy and Pelf, and get Vargas ready to go in AAA. Best case scenario as I see it, Duque can come back to the Pen and Pedro can come back at some point and take over for whichever of FiggyPelf is struggling. It’s best for the organization longterm to move on from these guys mentally and take whatever we get from them as a bonus.
Of course, it is hard to remember that Figgy is 33–almost as old as Pedro!
this seems to be a non-story. if it was decided on april 1 to keep pedro out 4-6 weeks, that takes us till the middle of may, a date which the story presents as a new time for him to come back. the only difference seems to be that he MIGHT not come back for another two weeks after that. it’s not like we expected him back in exactly 4 weeks. we knew it would be longer. and we’ll be just fine till he comes back. so it seems that really, nothing has changed.
off-day no new news story
1) El Duque is best forgotten about. He’s 42 and his body is done. If he makes it back, it will be 4 or 5 starts before he’s out again. Duque done.
2) The title is a bit misleading. Article says mid to late May, possibly June. The Metsblog title suggests he’s out THROUGH June, which means July/ASB return. Granted, it could certainly be July or August, but that’s not what’s being reported right now, and I was fooled by the title.
3 There was a season a few years ago where the Mets went into July or August have used just 5 starters. I thought that was amazing, and think so even more now. I’m not yet convinced that Pelfrey is ready for prime time, nor that Figueroa will avoiding joining a list of fill-in starters who left under ugly circumstances (the Lima/Gonzales list has grown quite long under Minaya).
He’ll be back for the home opener at CitiField - watching from the VIP suite.
This is what happens to mid-30s players without the help of HGH. I think we are all going to have to get used to this, again.
Excellent point, Charlie. I wish more people would realize that HGH isn’t cheating your opponents it is cheating father time. Players using it to stay healthy longer make a better product for the fans and a better sport overall.
Well it is not good news, but agree with the overall sentiment of everyone else that it is going to be while before we see Pedro or El Duque back. I’m guessing around the All Star break.
Keep throwing strikes Big Pelf, and go get’em FIGGY!
This is about what was expected, no? Did anyone really believe it would be six weeks?
I could not help but think of Bannister when this happened and he took for ever to come back. Granted he had complications develop but I really wonder if we will see Pedro again this year. And I really don’t think we will see him before July.
This shouldn’t make any difference to this team.
For the past two or three years we have been playing this same game. The good part about it now is we actually have some who can fill the role left by this gap. Tony Armas is not Jose LIma. He is a serviceable number 5 pitcher. Claudio Vargas the same. We have John Pelfrey finally getting his chance under conditions which are favorable to his mindset. We have three quality starters this year. That is better than we have had in past years. Remember, last year, John Maine was an unknown, Ollie Perez had questions about whether he could rebound from the previous year. Last year, all we had that was a known starter was Tom Glavine. Everyone else had questions surrounding them. Plus we had no number five at all and we went through the entire year that way. The year before we had John Maine and Ollie Perez shouldering the playoff load because only Tom Glavine was a known quantity. And that is pretty scary to ask two unknowns to shoulder the playoff load.
Our starters have been a question mark since Willie took over. That is not his doing.
The best part about it is we are seriously working on developing some now Jon Niese etc. We know we need them.
I hate to be that guy…but John Pelfrey is a college basketball coach…Mike Pelfrey is the guy you want to write about…
Beyond that…I agree with everything you are saying…
Man! I love Pedro - I really do. I’ve just gotta point out that by the time this guy’s contract is up, he might very well only have been healthy enough to play for 50 to 60 percent of the time. That is frankly Julio Franco-ish. Still, who knows where the Mets would be right now if we didn’t sign Pedro. Maybe a better question is “Where are we?”.
Livan Hernandez. Woulda, coulda…
The bottom line is, whose to say Pedro doesn’t come back and something else happens. In fact, its likely.
The guy pitched 3 innings and bang….hes out. HIm and Duque are old and broken down.
FUTHERMORE….while everyone says pitching wins, the Mets rotation is not the problem right now…its really not.
Its their bats….they are losing games right now because this team is absolutely 100% incapable of getting big hits with RISP.
It never happens, to the point where when the opportunity presents itself, I think most fans are all waiting for the shoe to drop.
And one game showing glimpses of clutch hitting doesn’t do anything. The Mets need to hit with RISP on a weekly basis….it has to be consistant if they want to be considered a force in this league. So far…we have seen absolutely none of it.
i do agree with that. when theres a situation with 2nd and 3rd or 1st and 3rd and 2 outs it doesnt matter who is up i literally have ZERO confidence in a hit. with less than two outs i find myself just hoping for a sac fly or something bc i have very little confidence in our “clutch hitting”. the weird this is, is that we’re actually hitting well as a team with RISP ( i think like 280 or something).
I agree - the Bats need to improve, in the clutch and otherwise.
But Willie’s mismanagement of the pitching staff - both bullpen and starters - is likely going to be a long term issue unless he wises up really soon.
That really concerns me, while the necessity of hitting does not so much. The bats will come around, but the pitching/pitching management is a whole other issue that needs some fundamental changes in order to get us through a long season.
Duque’s finished, hopefully he will retire and be able to walk again someday without his trusty boot. He is not worth a second thought at this point, spring training was a joke.
I’m not ready to write off pedro just yet. He pulled a hamstring, it happens to young pitchers as well, they heal. He didn’t reinjure his shoulder/blow out an elbow. He has motivation ($) to pitch well which is very powerful. Even if he comes back in July, there is alot of baseball left and he would be a better option than Figgy/Vargas/Armas. And if they happen to make the post season, they would be more dangerous with Pedro.
I’m happy Pelfrey has to pitch. When you look at them, he has to be a part of the rotation next year as there will likely be no Pedro and possibly no Perez. Looking forward to getting Alou back with all due respect to Pagan. They were a diferent team offensively when he played last year.
At the risk of sounding irrationally optimistic, when Pedro went down, I got to thinking about the whole thing and this is really how I feel:
Maybe this is for the best as far as the Mets are concerned. It is VERY sad and VERY difficult to see good/great players at the end of their careers. It also presents a major problem for the team because the garner so much respect and are shown such deferrence, that it can actually hurt the team.
Many people have said that if Pedro is healthy he can get people out and win games. But I’m not so sure about that anymore. The problem is, if Pedro IS healthy, the Mets will run him out there. And what you will likely get is a mediocre or sub-par 5 inning pitcher at best. That will result in a lot of games with the Mets likely behind on the scoreboard and into their bullpen in the 5th or 6th inning. This will stress a bullpen that already figures to be overused throughout the year.
All the above can be said for El Duque as well. Consider it a blessing that they aren’t both healthy. We would likely experience the above 2 out of every 5 starts.
I think that a healthy Pedro / El Duque combination MIGHT win 12 - 15 games combined. And they AREN’T healthy, and both figure to miss so much time that even that figure is most likely unattainable. If you don’t believe some COMBINATION of Figueroa/Pelfrey/Armas, Jr./Claudio Varga and even a Jonathan Niese can win 15 games then the Mets aren’t really contenders anyway.
So I have resigned myself to the thinking that maybe the best thing for the Mets this year is to see both of them shelved for the bulk of the season, see what we can get from some younger arms and cut ties with both Pedro and El Duque at season’s end. Sad to say, but they are both finished.