Brandon Eddy

Read: Stark’s Grumblings
By Brandon Eddy - May 1, 2008 2:47 pm

In his latest Rumblings & Grumblings column at ESPN.com, Jayson Stark reviews the month of April, which he dubbed “a month that really defied logic.”

According to Stark, the Lastings Milledge for Ryan Church and Brian Schneider trade was the “best deal of the winter that got ripped at the time.”

A scout, as quoted by Stark commented:

“Hell, Ryan Church is that team’s MVP so far,” said one scout, “offensively and defensively. And Schneider is in a system now where his talents are accentuated, because there’s so much emphasis on game-planning and game-calling. Milledge, for me, is just a marginal player with great skills. We’ll see if that changes.”

…i agree with the scout…it is scary to think where this team would be without church playing the way he has so far this season…

RSS feed

51 Comments »

Comment by Free Aaron Heilman
2008-05-01 14:50:53

At the time the trade was made I approved of it. but it’s turned out even better than I thought it would. What surprises me the most is how well-rounded a player Church is.

It is one of Omar’s best trades. Ever.

Comment by Roach2
2008-05-01 14:57:11

I was always a fan of the trade too, but let’s wait until at least June to decide where this lies…

Comment by Free Aaron Heilman
2008-05-01 15:09:52

OK, I fixed it …

So far, it is one of Omar’s best trades. Ever.

:smile:

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Danny
2008-05-01 15:42:27

June? How about 2011?

It’s way too early to claim victory. Time will tell.

Church is better than expected and I live in DC and knew he was underrated.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Dirtysanchez
2008-05-01 15:01:55

Agreed. I have always defended this trade. Granted i think nobody would have thought church was going to be this good but i always felt we were getting 2 good pieces for one who may/maynot be a superstar. Schnieder has been great handling the pitchers. Both of these guys have been brought in and have performed better than we all expected. Definatly one of the best moves omar has done especially with milledges decline in stock value. Good job Church keep it up

 
Comment by Giaco
2008-05-01 15:02:35

He also says that one scout believes the only way he will get better is if he reunites with Peterson as his pitching coach. If Giants ate most of his contract, I’d take him.

Comment by dykstraw
2008-05-01 15:14:57

i’ve been saying this all week. this could be the move that makes a dynasty.

Comment by Tidewater
2008-05-01 16:42:40

are we talking about Zito?

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by Not Pat Zachry
2008-05-01 15:03:01

Church will have his ups and downs but Schneider (because of his managing the pitching staff) will be the seldom sung hero. If Pelfry has a good year it will be because of Schneider. This will turn out to be a very good deal even if Lastings lasts.

 
Comment by euchreking
2008-05-01 15:06:34

Two above average position players–with higher potential than we realized at the time–for one with raw talent and too much swagger for what he had achieved thus far. Great trade; thought so at the time. We needed a catcher. We didn’t get a young one with great potential, but it turns out we got a really good one who hits too. Someone we can build around for a few years anyway, and we don’t have to worry about filling that one hole next off-season. Stability at catcher is a great thing. And Church is one of the few Mets showing guts, heart, and some swagger right now; he’s more than quieted the doubters. Another great addition that’ll hopefully keep paying dividends. Throw in Santana and it was a great off-season. We should be rolling right now, no? So what happened?

 
Comment by grmetsfan
2008-05-01 15:12:45

I saw this coming, people didn’t give Church a chance in the off season and I knew what to expect based on his stats with the nats. All that hype about church not being able to hit lefties has turned out to be over done.

And Schneider is a nice defensive upgrade behind the plate, it’s about time we have a starting catcher that can consistently throw some runners out!

Comment by koosman3669
2008-05-01 15:18:26

Church is a tremendous defensive upgrade over Green and definitely over Milledge. To Church going to get the ball is just a job, to those two guys last year it was always an adventure.

 
 
Comment by cyclone
2008-05-01 15:14:01

FYI - Florida just lost, so we are now the first place Mets….lol

Comment by Free Aaron Heilman
2008-05-01 15:21:13

Yes, and only Mets fans would talk about firing the manager when their team is in first place on May 1st.

Comment by zen
2008-05-01 15:24:13

or judge a trade after a month.

love the way church approaches the game though.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by Free Aaron Heilman
2008-05-01 15:28:40

As long as you qualify that judgment, then it’s ok. For example, it’s ok to say so far, the Church-Schneider/Milledge trade is a steal for the Mets.

 
Comment by zen
2008-05-01 15:29:57

agreed.

 
Comment by hyperion4
2008-05-01 15:43:18

Seems to me there were a lot of folks giving *definitive* judgments on the trade — generally pretty negative — the day after the trade and for months after, before any of the players involved had played an inning for their new teams.

 
Comment by zen
2008-05-01 15:49:17

that was a product of several years of rumors that had milledge landing manny ramirez or dan haren.

 
Comment by hyperion4
2008-05-01 16:24:30

The Mets *did* reach an agreement with the (then)Devil Rays and the Red Sox at the trade deadline in 2005 on a deal in which the Mets would have gotten Manny and given up Milledge and quite a bit else besides, but the Devil Rays backed out at the last minute.

There was never going to be a Milledge-for-Ramirez or Milledge-for-Haren straight-up deal. I can’t believe anyone seriously thinks that there was.

 
Comment by zen
2008-05-01 16:36:54

nobody said it was a straight-up deal.

you may also want to consider scott edward kazmir. if milledge is .290 28hr 105rbi in 2 years and the mets haven’t won a world series….watch for the reaction.

just glad church has played so well.

 
Comment by Tidewater
2008-05-01 16:46:13

I still don’t like the trade, and I have always thought Church was better than most people imagined he’d be.

I think a young, cheap, contractually controllable player like Milledge is worth more than what we got. Unless there was a glaring need for a position to be filled — and there wasn’t — I think this is a head-scratcher of a trade. Still do, despite the success of the players we got thus far.

 
 
 
 
Comment by Koko
2008-05-01 15:16:02

It’s a great trade for the Mets, but it was still a good trade for the Nats.

Both Church and Schneider are older. Milledge is still only 23. Nats are playing for the future and that future really didn’t include either Church or Schneider, while Milledge might still be as good or better then Church when he is 29.

I’m not a big Milledge fan at all, but it completely made sense for both parties. Mets needed more mature players to win now.

Comment by toomanyuniforms
2008-05-01 17:58:29

Don’t know about that. Their pitching staff actually overachieved last year, believe it or not, and I’m sure a lot of that credit goes to Schneider. If they implode this year, their development could be stunted.

 
 
Comment by dave27
2008-05-01 15:16:39

Kind of typical Mets…it’s never the things you actually worry about that end up killing you.

Well, almost never.

 
Comment by Kellman
2008-05-01 15:23:36

So every Mets fan liked this trade. K, and no one boos either.

Comment by Roach2
2008-05-01 16:09:58

Look back to a previous thread about this trade, guy…then you can pass judgment on the right people

Comment by Kellman
2008-05-01 22:43:05

Haha, thanks guy.

No one claims they boo, yet there are overwhelming boos at Shea. For two weeks everyone has been acting like they wanted this trade, yet there was a huge outcry when overrated “potential star” Lastings was dealt.

- guy

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by gowrightgo
2008-05-01 18:43:10

Good point…..I was unabashedly against the trade. So was 90% of the commenters on the site at the time it went down. BS to those above who say they were for this trade when it went down.

My problem with the trade then and now is that the team neeed RH outfield help. That is Milledge. While he is struggling a bit now…he is still a terrific looking young player who has the potential to be a dynamic all star. I am still pissed that the media and the few aged “vets” on this team skewed the view of the owners and Minaya enough to dump this kid at 50 cents on the dollar.

While Church has done better than we expected and Schneider when healthy has been exactly what we expected, both of these guys are nice complimentary players but not potential all stars. Church just completed a nice month. I actually like more than I thought I would. He has hit righties and lefties so this is not a knock against him…Just think that Milledge did not get a fair opportunity to succeed here and that in the long run…with the right tutelage, he can become another Alex Rios type player.

 
 
Comment by OrangeKing
2008-05-01 15:28:31

Church has been great, and I thought the trade was at least reasonable from the beginning. On the other hand, any scout (or person) who thinks Church has been the team’s offensive MVP is crazy (Wright, despite struggling at times, leads the team in OBP, SLG%, HR, RBI, and virtually all other categories).

Comment by mackey_sassers_arm
2008-05-01 15:34:09

I think Church has been just as valuable to the mets successes so far this season as Wright and his defense has been far greater. if that opinion is “crazy” then so be it, but I am just trying to look at things objectively

 
 
Comment by casey s.
2008-05-01 15:36:34

c’mon!

if it’s too early to write off the season after a sub-standard start, it’s certainly too early to make any conclusions about this trade.