Comments on: Video: Ryan Church Q&A with NYP

By: Chris in Japan

Chris in Japan — Mon, 19 May 2008 06:01:03 +0000

Ha, ha! Umm… no. U2 does not suck, my friend. One of the most prolific, intelligent and artful bands around–still.

Same goes for PearlJam. Just a different style and a different world view.

Excuse me? Dave Matthews Band? Who the hell are they?

By: novanoto

novanoto — Mon, 19 May 2008 04:52:52 +0000

yea, that must be true, whatever you say chief

By: metsftw

metsftw — Mon, 19 May 2008 04:14:23 +0000

LOL

dave matthews is for high school kids and frat boys

By: m00kie

m00kie — Mon, 19 May 2008 03:05:53 +0000

I’d have to consider U2 part of the 80s, and dmb+pearl jam etc more 90s

By: shinjosplints17

shinjosplints17 — Mon, 19 May 2008 02:33:52 +0000

This Guy needs a nickname, I have idea what to call him. I’ve been going with “The Pope” but i want something better.

By: egnirc

egnirc — Sun, 18 May 2008 23:59:48 +0000

Not rich enough to buy a 300$ shirt.
Waiting for Modells to make their 79$ Replica with Authentic number and names.

By: gipper82475

gipper82475 — Sun, 18 May 2008 23:52:55 +0000

Who cares how they act? It’s about results.

By: gipper82475

gipper82475 — Sun, 18 May 2008 23:52:04 +0000

You can easily get them on MLB.com’s store website.

By: Danny1986

Danny1986 — Sun, 18 May 2008 23:31:03 +0000

why does u2 suck? would really like to understand why someone (applying concise points) would think that.

By: novanoto

novanoto — Sun, 18 May 2008 23:00:09 +0000

haha…i didnt disrespect u2, i personally consider them the generation just before dave matthews band, more of an ’80′s began band, instead of a ’90′s began band….

as for pearl jam, i agree…it’s them and dmb for me…just two totally different types of music styling, and personally, i think dmb has been more consistent, but of course, that’s just my opinion