SNY.tvBLOG NETWORKSCHEDULESTATSSTANDINGS VIDEO Headlines:

Mike Nichols

Note: Daniel Murphy Is Clutch
By Mike Nichols - Aug 28, 2008 10:36 am

In the eighth inning of last night’s come-for-behind win versus the Phillies, Daniel Murphy, who was mired in an 0-for-16 slump, came to the plate with the scored tied at three with two on and two out to face Phillies closer Brad Lidge.

Murphy lined a clutch double to left to score the go-ahead run and put the Mets in the lead for good.

Jerry Manuel, on his confidence in Murphy, speaking to reporters after the game:

“I feel very comfortable. He is very good hitter. We’ve seen him in one of his better streaks and now we see him somewhat struggle, coming back to normal. But at the same time he is putting together good at-bats. I feel very confident when he is at the plate. I never thought about pinch hitting for him. He is a part of what we are doing and feel like he can come through for us and he did.”

Unlike Manuel, I thought either Fernando Tatis or Damion Easley should have pinch hit for Murphy when Phillies LHP Scott Eyre came on to pitch in the sixth. I’m glad Manuel had faith in his young player, because it certainly paid off later.

49 Responses to “Note: Daniel Murphy Is Clutch”

  1. chicagometfan says:

    I was also surprised when Tatis did not pinch hit for Murphy in the 6Th but it sure ended up working out and giving the kid lots of confidence

    His double was lined to right not left

    • nyleetch2 says:

      yeah i was gonna say – i thought it was hit to right but i thought maybe i got confused… (because keith was talking about how daniel naturally drives the ball to left field, and only occasionally hits it to right – just before he hit the ball to right)

  2. backinbusiness says:

    I saw a Daniel Murphy kid’s size jersey at the team store at Shea the other day. Perhaps the Mets are getting one step closer to — gasp! — actually having apparel for players on the roster. (Along the same lines, it is really freaking lame that we don’t have “Topps” “cards” for half the lineup about the ticket booths.)

    It ticks me off that Lidge gets to be a “perfect” 31/31 saves after this and a previous similar Wagner-like non-save outing.

    • Ceetar says:

      Aww..be nice. Lidge will only have that perfect save record to stare at at home in October.

      It’s always annoyed me about the Topps cards. I could understand when they didn’t have really late season guys like Conine, but guys that were called up early like Tatis? pfft. I mean, obviously some buisness they do before the season and forget about, and some they can do mid-season, like the lineups “Daniel Murphy, Number 28…whereeverhe’s from”

      I’m shocked there was a jersey..they are a litttle…better recently and at Shea. I’m hoping they’ll be much better at the Citi.

    • LongJohnMaine says:

      No worries – as long as we touched him up yesterday. He’s very human, despite his perfect 31 of 31. On a related note, the splits between save-outings and non-save outings is downright frightening for some of these guys.

      Also, I’d like to thank good old Cholly for making such an awful decision by leaving Seanez in about three batters too long.

      • backinbusiness says:

        What, you didn’t think 3-6 with 2HRs was a good matchup???? :)

        We def got the better Manuel. Can you imagine if this clown was ours? Oy.

    • PhillyMet says:

      Lidge also had another similar-type of non-save situation earlier in the year where he let up 7 or 8 runs in the 9th.

  3. twassel says:

    The hit was to right field, but otherwise a good post.

  4. mrose says:

    see, i saw no reason to pinch hit tatis for murph…you have to think JUST in case this game went to extras again that you would need a pinch hitter late, so to me, that is a no brainer

  5. mikey_FF says:

    Daniel Murphy is not only clutch …

    He is serious!

    • khmustache says:

      and business-like!

    • toomanyuniforms says:

      Meanwhile, what the heck happened to the ONLY Met that could hit the Phils in September last year, Wright. Although if you believe in “BABIP”, he’s been “unlucky” in the ninth inning of games this year, he’s hitting .229 in innings 7-9, with 33 K’s in 171 plate appearances. In innings 1-3, he’s hitting .310 with 27 K’s in 229 plate appearances. OPS dives from a terrific .954 to a ho-hum .776, with only 5 of his 25 HR coming after the sixth inning. Why is the run differential so poor late in games? Not just the bullpen’s fault.

      Interestingly, while he craps the bed with RISP and 2 out, his “close and late” and “high leverage” averages aren’t bad.

      • mikey_FF says:

        He’s having bad at bats. Always seems to be down 0-2. Swinging at bad pitches out of the zone.

        Daniel Murphy has to remind him how to approach an at bat. heh

  6. mrose says:

    anyone want to ruin the philly takeover at shea thing?
    apparently at mets com they have a group ticket option and you can get in with PHILLY/METS and buy their group tickets at $25 each..i’m tempted

  7. SoDakMets says:

    How nice is it to have the option of Tatis off the bench now? Add Murphy, Easley, and Endy to that mix and I would say that this is the best bench for the last few years. Even though the injuries were a pain in the butt earlier in the year, they may pay off in the long run.

    Think about this…Church is still getting back into baseball shape. He should be rounding into form midway thru September and that may be the best call-up we could have hoped for…

    • dwright5_godsend says:

      Agreed on the bench comment. Except I think Endy is only a help in the field, not really at the plate. Nontheless I think this team has a lot of options late in a game. Time to call up a plethora of arms to help the bullpen September 1st. If anything, it might scare the veterans into pitching well, or else they will lose their jobs to a rook.

      • SoDakMets says:

        I should have clarified the Endy thing. I shouldn’t have lumped him in with the hitters. Although, he does have his moments. His value comes from his speed as a pinch runner or his excellent range. With Endy’s entrance in the 8th inning the Mets’ outfield becomes the best in baseball. They can run anything down.

    • chicagometfan says:

      Do you really think this bench is better than Franco and Newhan?

      • dwright5_godsend says:

        Nope. That is the greatest all-time.

      • SoDakMets says:

        You got me on that one.

        Just imagine how amazing our bench would be with Ruben Gotay on it? I think that if he is on the roster, we have probably already clinched. Or at least gotten the magic number to single digits….

        Isn’t it funny how decisions that many on here just hated at the beginning of the season are now the ones that are carrying the team?

        • dwright5_godsend says:

          Like the one where we signed Luis Castillo to a 4-year deal? (*takes a swig from the bottle of JD)

        • SoDakMets says:

          I would say that putting guys like Tatis on the roster and making the deal that brought in Church and Schneider not to mention not giving away Big Pelf or Delgado (even though a majority of the NegaMets on here wanted it) outweigh that contract. Besides, in a couple years we will just cut him and eat the contract. It isn’t that big of a contract that it will really affect the bottom line.

  8. backinbusiness says:

    Clearly the Post didn’t get the “DANIEL” memo:

    http://www.nypost.com/seven/08282008/frontback.htm

    Man, how great must that feel.

  9. MealTicket says:

    Off point: Joel Sherman apparently thinks the Mets should pick up Carl Pavano from the Skanks to replace Maine in the stretch run.

    Is this anything other than a truly appalling idea? Is there any upside to it for us?

    • NYP-BOS-NYP says:

      None whatsoever.

      Well, actually, who knows what a change of scenery can do for a pitcher (see: Luis Ayala). But yeah, the idea, if not completely appalling, is at least pretty “out there.”

      • ravi3 says:

        Well, if Niese fails to impress, and the Mets can get Pavano for peanuts, why not even try?

        AND in the event that he puts together a few decent starts, how great would that be, to rub in the yankees’ face

      • dwright5_godsend says:

        I always thought Ayala had decent stuff. Not overwhelming, but decent. It’s not just a change of scenery, however, it’s a change of situation. had he gone to colorado or pittsburgh, he’d still suck because he wouldn’t be in a winning situation. But now that he’s in New York, he’s in a playoff race for the first time of his career, and what he does out on the mound actually means something.

        • PhillyMet says:

          Ayala was also brought to the majors by Omar with Montreal, and he stated after the trade that he feels he owes Omar and is out to prove himself.

          Looks good so far…

        • NYP-BOS-NYP says:

          Oh, agreed — I wasn’t saying that Ayala’s current success is a fluke… but I don’t think any of us thought he would be as dominant as he’s turned out to be. And I suspect that has much to do with changes — of scenery, of situation, of any of a number of things.

          I guess I was saying that it’s possible that the same kind of things could happen with Carl Pavano if we signed him up, but I kind of doubt it. I think Ayala may have more raw talent.

  10. X-Man says:

    I hate to say it, and I know it’s not fair to wagner since Ayala has only showed us a small sample of success compared to Wagner’s many more saves, But……………………………

    For some strange reason I feel much more relaxed and confident when Ayala comes in to pitch the 9th than I do (did) when Wagner comes (came) in.