<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vote: Jerry Manuel Confidence Rating</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.metsblog.com/2008/09/10/vote-jerry-manuel-confidence-rating-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2008/09/10/vote-jerry-manuel-confidence-rating-2/</link>
	<description>Latest Mets News, Links, Rumors and Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 21:22:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2008/09/10/vote-jerry-manuel-confidence-rating-2/#comment-324165</link>
		<dc:creator>patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 16:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2008/09/10/vote-jerry-manuel-confidence-rating-2/#comment-324165</guid>
		<description>Cause and effect do not mean a whole lot because it can be very fleeting.

Further if the cause was simply Randolph, it could be surmised that Manuel himself has had no effect and that the sheer removal of Randolph led to everything.

Bud Harrelson once had a cause and effect relationship that lasted one second place finish.

No one mistakes him with managerial greatness.

Other cause &amp; effect managers?  Bob Lemon?  Phil Garner?

Randolphs undoing was nothing especially manageresque, tactically speaking.  His undoing was never for a minute allowing the idea that perhaps something could have been done differently in the final 17 games in its aftermath.  Never once saying, perhaps I could have done this or that, and need to learn from that.  He stood fast and strong that it was his way or the highway and then took if further with craziness this year.  He moves Church into the two hole, and rather than saying &quot;hey it has worked better than I could have imagined&quot; when questioned about it, he says &quot;that is not going to be the way we keep it:&quot;

He was paraoid or at least hyper guarded his whole tenure and that became near insanity by memorial day this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cause and effect do not mean a whole lot because it can be very fleeting.</p>
<p>Further if the cause was simply Randolph, it could be surmised that Manuel himself has had no effect and that the sheer removal of Randolph led to everything.</p>
<p>Bud Harrelson once had a cause and effect relationship that lasted one second place finish.</p>
<p>No one mistakes him with managerial greatness.</p>
<p>Other cause &amp; effect managers?  Bob Lemon?  Phil Garner?</p>
<p>Randolphs undoing was nothing especially manageresque, tactically speaking.  His undoing was never for a minute allowing the idea that perhaps something could have been done differently in the final 17 games in its aftermath.  Never once saying, perhaps I could have done this or that, and need to learn from that.  He stood fast and strong that it was his way or the highway and then took if further with craziness this year.  He moves Church into the two hole, and rather than saying &#8220;hey it has worked better than I could have imagined&#8221; when questioned about it, he says &#8220;that is not going to be the way we keep it:&#8221;</p>
<p>He was paraoid or at least hyper guarded his whole tenure and that became near insanity by memorial day this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MetsFan4Decades</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2008/09/10/vote-jerry-manuel-confidence-rating-2/#comment-324090</link>
		<dc:creator>MetsFan4Decades</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 16:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2008/09/10/vote-jerry-manuel-confidence-rating-2/#comment-324090</guid>
		<description>Agreed.  I voted him a 9.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed.  I voted him a 9.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free Aaron Heilman II</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2008/09/10/vote-jerry-manuel-confidence-rating-2/#comment-324045</link>
		<dc:creator>Free Aaron Heilman II</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 15:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2008/09/10/vote-jerry-manuel-confidence-rating-2/#comment-324045</guid>
		<description>Apples and oranges.

1) The only reason he can use situational matchups so liberally now is due to the expanded rosters. For whatever reasons, last September there were not the plethora of choices that Manuel has now. Prior to the arrival of Ayala and the expanded rosters, the bullpen was as dismal as it was often under Willie.

2) As long as Wagner wasn&#039;t on the DL, Willie had to use him as the closer, even though last year and this year, he started fading after the early part of the season. Manuel has the luxury of using an Ayala and Stokes as well as others  to experiment with the closer position now. It has worked to the Mets advantage now to not have a fading and unreliable Wagner down the stretch.

I like the job Manuel has done so far but he hasn&#039;t been perfect. For example, for the last two years, righties have hit Myers significantly better than lefties, yet Manuel loaded up the Mets lineup with lefties on Friday, a big mistake especially considering Easley has great numbers against Myers. 

I think he Manuel deserves to be brought back next year too. Just don&#039;t give him too much credit for the patched together bullpen. If anything, credit Omar for getting Ayala and Stokes and calling up a lot of extra arms this September.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apples and oranges.</p>
<p>1) The only reason he can use situational matchups so liberally now is due to the expanded rosters. For whatever reasons, last September there were not the plethora of choices that Manuel has now. Prior to the arrival of Ayala and the expanded rosters, the bullpen was as dismal as it was often under Willie.</p>
<p>2) As long as Wagner wasn&#8217;t on the DL, Willie had to use him as the closer, even though last year and this year, he started fading after the early part of the season. Manuel has the luxury of using an Ayala and Stokes as well as others  to experiment with the closer position now. It has worked to the Mets advantage now to not have a fading and unreliable Wagner down the stretch.</p>
<p>I like the job Manuel has done so far but he hasn&#8217;t been perfect. For example, for the last two years, righties have hit Myers significantly better than lefties, yet Manuel loaded up the Mets lineup with lefties on Friday, a big mistake especially considering Easley has great numbers against Myers. </p>
<p>I think he Manuel deserves to be brought back next year too. Just don&#8217;t give him too much credit for the patched together bullpen. If anything, credit Omar for getting Ayala and Stokes and calling up a lot of extra arms this September.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MetsfaninTX</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2008/09/10/vote-jerry-manuel-confidence-rating-2/#comment-324041</link>
		<dc:creator>MetsfaninTX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 15:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2008/09/10/vote-jerry-manuel-confidence-rating-2/#comment-324041</guid>
		<description>thats hilarious</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thats hilarious</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nightlife</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2008/09/10/vote-jerry-manuel-confidence-rating-2/#comment-324039</link>
		<dc:creator>Nightlife</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 15:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2008/09/10/vote-jerry-manuel-confidence-rating-2/#comment-324039</guid>
		<description>Maybe someone will hit a bomb off Lidge and rattle him up ala Pujols &#039;05.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe someone will hit a bomb off Lidge and rattle him up ala Pujols &#8217;05.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mets Fan on Wall St.</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2008/09/10/vote-jerry-manuel-confidence-rating-2/#comment-324038</link>
		<dc:creator>Mets Fan on Wall St.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 15:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2008/09/10/vote-jerry-manuel-confidence-rating-2/#comment-324038</guid>
		<description>I recall Wright sitting against Seattle and then coming back to hit two HR&#039;s the next day.  As for Floyd, that&#039;s not on Jerry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recall Wright sitting against Seattle and then coming back to hit two HR&#8217;s the next day.  As for Floyd, that&#8217;s not on Jerry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CaseStreet</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2008/09/10/vote-jerry-manuel-confidence-rating-2/#comment-324035</link>
		<dc:creator>CaseStreet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 15:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2008/09/10/vote-jerry-manuel-confidence-rating-2/#comment-324035</guid>
		<description>Gov Patterson was on Boomer and Carton this mornig and said a big difference between Willie and Jerry is that while Willie would say &quot;Let&#039;s see what happens&quot; when a player did well, Jerry on the other hand will praise that player right away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gov Patterson was on Boomer and Carton this mornig and said a big difference between Willie and Jerry is that while Willie would say &#8220;Let&#8217;s see what happens&#8221; when a player did well, Jerry on the other hand will praise that player right away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MetsfaninTX</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2008/09/10/vote-jerry-manuel-confidence-rating-2/#comment-324033</link>
		<dc:creator>MetsfaninTX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 15:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2008/09/10/vote-jerry-manuel-confidence-rating-2/#comment-324033</guid>
		<description>all the things you list, I could never see Willie doing.
Part of the reason Manual looks so good is that the
man he replaced was so bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>all the things you list, I could never see Willie doing.<br />
Part of the reason Manual looks so good is that the<br />
man he replaced was so bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: therealsince86</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2008/09/10/vote-jerry-manuel-confidence-rating-2/#comment-324032</link>
		<dc:creator>therealsince86</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 15:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2008/09/10/vote-jerry-manuel-confidence-rating-2/#comment-324032</guid>
		<description>Or the one who would bench Cliff Floyd during a hitting streak.  But that being said, didn&#039;t Manuel bench Wright during a hitting streak this season?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or the one who would bench Cliff Floyd during a hitting streak.  But that being said, didn&#8217;t Manuel bench Wright during a hitting streak this season?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: X-Man</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2008/09/10/vote-jerry-manuel-confidence-rating-2/#comment-324030</link>
		<dc:creator>X-Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 15:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2008/09/10/vote-jerry-manuel-confidence-rating-2/#comment-324030</guid>
		<description>Ceetar will probably disagree.  LOL  What do you think Ceetar, a 6 maybe?   I know, you&#039;ll give him an 8 just to spite me!  lol.   

Just kidding with you buddy, I know you&#039;re still in Willie&#039;s corner and anything short of a WS appearence by Mets will justify your love affair with Willie.  

I for one give Manuel ALL the credit in the world.  Cause and effect people.  The numbers speak for themselves.  There are allot of people on here that &quot;Apologies&quot; for Willie stating excuses like it wasn&#039;t Willies fault that Delgado was crapy and that Wags blew saves and players were hurt. But if you look at it carefully, Manuel has had as much adversity (If Not More) with key players being hurt and the BP collapsing (For a long strecth)  etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ceetar will probably disagree.  LOL  What do you think Ceetar, a 6 maybe?   I know, you&#8217;ll give him an 8 just to spite me!  lol.   </p>
<p>Just kidding with you buddy, I know you&#8217;re still in Willie&#8217;s corner and anything short of a WS appearence by Mets will justify your love affair with Willie.  </p>
<p>I for one give Manuel ALL the credit in the world.  Cause and effect people.  The numbers speak for themselves.  There are allot of people on here that &#8220;Apologies&#8221; for Willie stating excuses like it wasn&#8217;t Willies fault that Delgado was crapy and that Wags blew saves and players were hurt. But if you look at it carefully, Manuel has had as much adversity (If Not More) with key players being hurt and the BP collapsing (For a long strecth)  etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (Requested URI is rejected)

Served from: www.metsblog.com @ 2012-02-14 01:42:00 -->
