<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Read: Beltran, Best Defense per James and Co.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.metsblog.com/2008/11/03/read-beltran-best-defense-per-james-and-co/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2008/11/03/read-beltran-best-defense-per-james-and-co/</link>
	<description>Latest Mets News, Links, Rumors and Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 21:22:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bucknersankles</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2008/11/03/read-beltran-best-defense-per-james-and-co/#comment-382150</link>
		<dc:creator>bucknersankles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 23:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2008/11/03/read-beltran-best-defense-per-james-and-co/#comment-382150</guid>
		<description>REYES HAS THE CAPACITY TO BECOME AN ELITE DEFENSIVE SS HE&#039;S DEMONSTRATED GREAT RANGE TO HIS LEFT AND RIGHT, HOWEVER HE&#039;S ALSO DEMONSTRATED A LACK OF CONCENTRATION AT TIMES AND IT HAS SHOWN IN HIS BEING CAUGHT FLAT FOOTED ON HIS HEELS,  YOUR WEIGHT DISTRIBUTION SHOULD BE TO THE FRONT OF YOUR FEET PRIOR TO THE PITCH ALLOWING FOR MAXIMUM SHIFTING AND QUICKNESS, ALSO I NOTICE THAT HE GIVES UP A LITTLE TO EASY SOMETIMES GOING BACK ON A BALL TO SHALLOW OUTFIELD. AS FAR AS HIS ARM IS CONCERNED IT IS A CANNON.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>REYES HAS THE CAPACITY TO BECOME AN ELITE DEFENSIVE SS HE&#8217;S DEMONSTRATED GREAT RANGE TO HIS LEFT AND RIGHT, HOWEVER HE&#8217;S ALSO DEMONSTRATED A LACK OF CONCENTRATION AT TIMES AND IT HAS SHOWN IN HIS BEING CAUGHT FLAT FOOTED ON HIS HEELS,  YOUR WEIGHT DISTRIBUTION SHOULD BE TO THE FRONT OF YOUR FEET PRIOR TO THE PITCH ALLOWING FOR MAXIMUM SHIFTING AND QUICKNESS, ALSO I NOTICE THAT HE GIVES UP A LITTLE TO EASY SOMETIMES GOING BACK ON A BALL TO SHALLOW OUTFIELD. AS FAR AS HIS ARM IS CONCERNED IT IS A CANNON.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 4JoeOrsulak</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2008/11/03/read-beltran-best-defense-per-james-and-co/#comment-382063</link>
		<dc:creator>4JoeOrsulak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 20:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2008/11/03/read-beltran-best-defense-per-james-and-co/#comment-382063</guid>
		<description>He is, even by a highly critical appraisal, one of the 8 or so best defensive 3rd baseman in baseball.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He is, even by a highly critical appraisal, one of the 8 or so best defensive 3rd baseman in baseball.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ravi3</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2008/11/03/read-beltran-best-defense-per-james-and-co/#comment-382019</link>
		<dc:creator>ravi3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 20:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2008/11/03/read-beltran-best-defense-per-james-and-co/#comment-382019</guid>
		<description>Thereal - I&#039;d think about 2 above average YOUNG of&#039;ers....players like the Dodgers&#039; Kemp and Either.

I wouldn&#039;t think about an average outfielder, because you can sign that type of player.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thereal &#8211; I&#8217;d think about 2 above average YOUNG of&#8217;ers&#8230;.players like the Dodgers&#8217; Kemp and Either.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t think about an average outfielder, because you can sign that type of player.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2008/11/03/read-beltran-best-defense-per-james-and-co/#comment-381994</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 20:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2008/11/03/read-beltran-best-defense-per-james-and-co/#comment-381994</guid>
		<description>Beltran is actually just underrated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beltran is actually just underrated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HOFMets57</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2008/11/03/read-beltran-best-defense-per-james-and-co/#comment-381992</link>
		<dc:creator>HOFMets57</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 19:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2008/11/03/read-beltran-best-defense-per-james-and-co/#comment-381992</guid>
		<description>Which beckons my original point. 

Trading Beltran is so difficult because he&#039;s BOTH overrated AND underrated. The no-trade cause is hard but if he can fetch a Lincecum or a Cain/Rowand package you have to think about it.

Beltran doesn&#039;t seem to like this city or the scrutiny it brings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which beckons my original point. </p>
<p>Trading Beltran is so difficult because he&#8217;s BOTH overrated AND underrated. The no-trade cause is hard but if he can fetch a Lincecum or a Cain/Rowand package you have to think about it.</p>
<p>Beltran doesn&#8217;t seem to like this city or the scrutiny it brings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whynot1</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2008/11/03/read-beltran-best-defense-per-james-and-co/#comment-381990</link>
		<dc:creator>whynot1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 19:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2008/11/03/read-beltran-best-defense-per-james-and-co/#comment-381990</guid>
		<description>Yankee prospects are always hyped, as in overhyped.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yankee prospects are always hyped, as in overhyped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whynot1</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2008/11/03/read-beltran-best-defense-per-james-and-co/#comment-381988</link>
		<dc:creator>whynot1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 19:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2008/11/03/read-beltran-best-defense-per-james-and-co/#comment-381988</guid>
		<description>Wright played in 50 plus more games than Zimmerman, which probably had something to do with Zimmerman finishing so low. That&#039;s also why Wright probably deserves the Gold Glove over him this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wright played in 50 plus more games than Zimmerman, which probably had something to do with Zimmerman finishing so low. That&#8217;s also why Wright probably deserves the Gold Glove over him this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2008/11/03/read-beltran-best-defense-per-james-and-co/#comment-381983</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 19:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2008/11/03/read-beltran-best-defense-per-james-and-co/#comment-381983</guid>
		<description>Yes, but fielding stats are MUCH more difficult to measure than hitting stats.  The reliability of defensive stats are not even in the same stratosphere as offensive stats.

Be VERY wary of defensive metrics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, but fielding stats are MUCH more difficult to measure than hitting stats.  The reliability of defensive stats are not even in the same stratosphere as offensive stats.</p>
<p>Be VERY wary of defensive metrics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whynot1</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2008/11/03/read-beltran-best-defense-per-james-and-co/#comment-381981</link>
		<dc:creator>whynot1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 19:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2008/11/03/read-beltran-best-defense-per-james-and-co/#comment-381981</guid>
		<description>Wright was first in the NL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wright was first in the NL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JamesK</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2008/11/03/read-beltran-best-defense-per-james-and-co/#comment-381978</link>
		<dc:creator>JamesK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 19:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2008/11/03/read-beltran-best-defense-per-james-and-co/#comment-381978</guid>
		<description>All I&#039;m saying is that judging players based solely on what the eye sees is tricky territory.  We don&#039;t do this for evaluation of hitting - why do it for evaluation of fielding?

Stats are completely objective, while the human eye is subjective.  I&#039;m not saying discount scouting in determining the best fielders - I&#039;m saying it should be stats 70%, naked eye 30%, or thereabouts.

P.S. I should note that, based on watching him play, I think Reyes is a phenomenal SS, better than Rollins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All I&#8217;m saying is that judging players based solely on what the eye sees is tricky territory.  We don&#8217;t do this for evaluation of hitting &#8211; why do it for evaluation of fielding?</p>
<p>Stats are completely objective, while the human eye is subjective.  I&#8217;m not saying discount scouting in determining the best fielders &#8211; I&#8217;m saying it should be stats 70%, naked eye 30%, or thereabouts.</p>
<p>P.S. I should note that, based on watching him play, I think Reyes is a phenomenal SS, better than Rollins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (Requested URI is rejected)

Served from: www.metsblog.com @ 2012-02-14 07:39:30 -->
