Comments on: Catcher: C is a Priority, No it’s Not, Yes it Is http://www.metsblog.com/2008/11/14/catcher-c-is-a-priority-no-its-not-yes-it-is/ Latest Mets News, Links, Rumors and Opinion Fri, 04 Feb 2011 21:22:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: rigsay http://www.metsblog.com/2008/11/14/catcher-c-is-a-priority-no-its-not-yes-it-is/#comment-387946 rigsay Fri, 14 Nov 2008 19:53:47 +0000 http://www.metsblog.com/2008/11/14/catcher-c-is-a-priority-no-its-not-yes-it-is/#comment-387946 The Phils just won the WS with Ruiz and Coste. The catcher position isn't the problem The Phils just won the WS with Ruiz and Coste. The catcher position isn’t the problem

]]> By: beltran the warrior http://www.metsblog.com/2008/11/14/catcher-c-is-a-priority-no-its-not-yes-it-is/#comment-387868 beltran the warrior Fri, 14 Nov 2008 18:50:16 +0000 http://www.metsblog.com/2008/11/14/catcher-c-is-a-priority-no-its-not-yes-it-is/#comment-387868 that's like saying jason phillips was proven because he hit .300 his rookie year. look, i like murphy but can we wait to see how he does with a full year under his belt and see how he handles putchers adjusting to him before we proclaim him as a rock in the mets foundation? he didn't do so hot when crunchtime came around and people started getting a handle on him. that’s like saying jason phillips was proven because he hit .300 his rookie year.

look, i like murphy but can we wait to see how he does with a full year under his belt and see how he handles putchers adjusting to him before we proclaim him as a rock in the mets foundation? he didn’t do so hot when crunchtime came around and people started getting a handle on him.

]]> By: Nordberg http://www.metsblog.com/2008/11/14/catcher-c-is-a-priority-no-its-not-yes-it-is/#comment-387853 Nordberg Fri, 14 Nov 2008 18:34:05 +0000 http://www.metsblog.com/2008/11/14/catcher-c-is-a-priority-no-its-not-yes-it-is/#comment-387853 Thanks Dave27 for enlightening me about how the market works. Let's just wait till March to fill our priorities. Real, so what did your crystal ball say we would have to give up? Thanks Dave27 for enlightening me about how the market works. Let’s just wait till March to fill our priorities.

Real, so what did your crystal ball say we would have to give up?

]]> By: jamie http://www.metsblog.com/2008/11/14/catcher-c-is-a-priority-no-its-not-yes-it-is/#comment-387831 jamie Fri, 14 Nov 2008 18:18:47 +0000 http://www.metsblog.com/2008/11/14/catcher-c-is-a-priority-no-its-not-yes-it-is/#comment-387831 think detroit would take that one back? think detroit would take that one back?

]]> By: jamie http://www.metsblog.com/2008/11/14/catcher-c-is-a-priority-no-its-not-yes-it-is/#comment-387828 jamie Fri, 14 Nov 2008 18:16:29 +0000 http://www.metsblog.com/2008/11/14/catcher-c-is-a-priority-no-its-not-yes-it-is/#comment-387828 so, some high scoring teams in pitcher's parks: CLE: 14.7% FLA: 14.4% DET: 14.5% Mets still not looking great. so, some high scoring teams in pitcher’s parks:

CLE: 14.7%
FLA: 14.4%
DET: 14.5%

Mets still not looking great.

]]> By: MudvilleNine http://www.metsblog.com/2008/11/14/catcher-c-is-a-priority-no-its-not-yes-it-is/#comment-387812 MudvilleNine Fri, 14 Nov 2008 18:03:53 +0000 http://www.metsblog.com/2008/11/14/catcher-c-is-a-priority-no-its-not-yes-it-is/#comment-387812 We all knew what we were getting in Schnieder when it came to his bat, and no one had a problem with it because his numbers were good for the number 8 hole. The problem was when he was shifted to the 7 hole because Castillo came up anemic. I see no problem keeping him as long as he's in that 8 hole. We all knew what we were getting in Schnieder when it came to his bat, and no one had a problem with it because his numbers were good for the number 8 hole. The problem was when he was shifted to the 7 hole because Castillo came up anemic. I see no problem keeping him as long as he’s in that 8 hole.

]]> By: jamie http://www.metsblog.com/2008/11/14/catcher-c-is-a-priority-no-its-not-yes-it-is/#comment-387800 jamie Fri, 14 Nov 2008 17:56:25 +0000 http://www.metsblog.com/2008/11/14/catcher-c-is-a-priority-no-its-not-yes-it-is/#comment-387800 true. I just looked at teams that scored the most runs. but I'll look at a couple of others in pitcher's parks (and it's a bit wonky, because you have to consider the overall talent of the lineup) true. I just looked at teams that scored the most runs. but I’ll look at a couple of others in pitcher’s parks (and it’s a bit wonky, because you have to consider the overall talent of the lineup)

]]> By: oleosmirf http://www.metsblog.com/2008/11/14/catcher-c-is-a-priority-no-its-not-yes-it-is/#comment-387789 oleosmirf Fri, 14 Nov 2008 17:46:45 +0000 http://www.metsblog.com/2008/11/14/catcher-c-is-a-priority-no-its-not-yes-it-is/#comment-387789 Javier Vasquez in his final 3 starts of the season in the thick of the playoff race for Chicago and his lone playoff start Sept 18 @ NYY 3.2 IP 6 ER Sept 23 @ MIN 4.0 IP 5 ER Sept 27 CLE 4.1 IP 7 ER Oct. 02 TBR 4.1 IP 6 ER 10.34 ERA in the postseason, 4.91 ERA as a yankee Not every player can play in NY and I feel Vasquez is one of these players and his track record supports this Javier Vasquez in his final 3 starts of the season in the thick of the playoff race for Chicago and his lone playoff start

Sept 18 @ NYY 3.2 IP 6 ER
Sept 23 @ MIN 4.0 IP 5 ER
Sept 27 CLE 4.1 IP 7 ER
Oct. 02 TBR 4.1 IP 6 ER

10.34 ERA in the postseason, 4.91 ERA as a yankee

Not every player can play in NY and I feel Vasquez is one of these players and his track record supports this

]]> By: Gina http://www.metsblog.com/2008/11/14/catcher-c-is-a-priority-no-its-not-yes-it-is/#comment-387788 Gina Fri, 14 Nov 2008 17:46:15 +0000 http://www.metsblog.com/2008/11/14/catcher-c-is-a-priority-no-its-not-yes-it-is/#comment-387788 Willis is nearly a lost cause. He might be fixable but with that contract and the amount of time/work a team would have to put in to fix him it probably wouldn't be worth it to trade for him. His issues run a lot deeper than change of scenery or a few mechanical issues or luck or anything. Willis is nearly a lost cause. He might be fixable but with that contract and the amount of time/work a team would have to put in to fix him it probably wouldn’t be worth it to trade for him. His issues run a lot deeper than change of scenery or a few mechanical issues or luck or anything.

]]> By: dwright5_godsend http://www.metsblog.com/2008/11/14/catcher-c-is-a-priority-no-its-not-yes-it-is/#comment-387786 dwright5_godsend Fri, 14 Nov 2008 17:45:44 +0000 http://www.metsblog.com/2008/11/14/catcher-c-is-a-priority-no-its-not-yes-it-is/#comment-387786 Ok, well I may be the only one, but I am fully confident in John Maine. Ok, well I may be the only one, but I am fully confident in John Maine.

]]>