SNY.tvBLOG NETWORKSCHEDULESTATSSTANDINGS VIDEO Headlines:

News: Citi Field Deal is Fine, per Mets
By Matthew Cerrone - Nov 21, 2008 10:35 am

The lead financial story today on CNN reads, “U.S. stocks looked set to rebound Friday from their recent fall after a report said financial giant Citigroup is considering selling itself.”

The report suggests Citigroup could be purchased by Goldman Sachs or JP Morgan Chase.

In 2006, Citigroup announced it would pay $20 million over 20 years for the naming rights of the Mets new ballpark, which has been named Citi Field.

Nevertheless, despite the financial state of Citigroup, a team spokesman recently told Biz of Baseball, “Everything is fine with our naming rights deal for Citi Field.”

like in most cases, if Citigroup is bought, it will retain its name and the deal with the Mets will remain in tact

that being said, i will forever hold out hope that the Mets and Apple will one day team up to create the first-ever iStadium, in which the team’s new home is a place where technology and baseball join forces…

…the best part is that we could call the stadium The Apple, in honor of the Home Run Apple, the Big Apple, etc

…and then i woke up

80 Responses to “News: Citi Field Deal is Fine, per Mets”

  1. mrBill aka DWright says:

    In 2006, Citigroup announced it would pay $20 million over 20 years for the naming rights of the Mets new ballpark, which has been named Citi Field.

    Ugh, disgusting!

    The Citigroup people who lost their jobs last week could use some (it not all) of these $20 million.

    • rustyjr says:

      very true – it might be called – the citi that will be in a eternal sleep – citi bank – my new jingle for em

    • mrose says:

      in the grand scheme of things…how much would it really help?

      • rustyjr says:

        well if it kept 15000 people employed id say thats better than the economy but im no adam smith

      • redmarauder07 says:

        They still need to spend on marketing and advertising to make money.

        The naming rights is a way to create more jobs by generating more business. If they stop advertising and lose business, a much larger number of people will lose their jobs.

        • rustyjr says:

          i wasn’t good in economics – thats why i keep getting screwed by the mets with 8 dollar beers and 5 dollar hot dogs lol

    • MetMaven says:

      I just hope it doesn’t end up being called Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal Stadium :-) He is one of Citi’s largest shareholders.

      • rustyjr says:

        as michael jackson would say HEE hee hee – shamon!!

        • gipper82475 says:

          U.S. Treasury Department Field?

          Chapter 11 Park?

          Insolvency Field at Bankruptcy Ballpark?

          Sub-Prime Park?

          Paulson Field?

          Campbell’s Park (known as “The Soup Kitchen”)?

          Wonder Bread Park (”Get on the Bread Line!”)?

  2. rustyjr says:

    from animal house – NO NEED TO PANIC EVERYTHING IS FINE DOOOOOOOOOON’T PANIC !!! – kevin bacons character as done by jeff wilpon

  3. zen says:

    that’s what the astros said with enron field

  4. steadyeddie says:

    Matt, you are a gem! What a funny post! No wonder you have been great at this for so long!
    Love ya, man
    steadyeddie (the poster formerly known as Number41)

    • rustyjr says:

      lets go steady eddie im a eddie too !!

      • They can change their name to the iMets. Every player will have his own digital avatar. Heilman will be missing his right arm. Castillo will not have any knees or range and Jose Reyes’ mouth will be completely white.

        • rustyjr says:

          i got it i got it jose can be a ma-ss of rasta braids d-wright can be a giant smile and the bull pen can be a big steaming turd!!

  5. I have a better marketing genious for the new Giants Stadium.

    JetBlue stadium. Although with the way things have historically gone…how about BlueJet stadium? :-)

    Too bad it will never happen and if it does, it’ll cost me $7,000 to fly to Florida.

  6. cval says:

    That’s $20 million per year or $400 million, not $20 million over 20 years. Big difference, and enough extra revenue that we should be demanding a lot more free agent activity from the Mets than we’re likely to get. They should be able to sign three of the available relievers (wood, fuentes, cruz for example). That would fix the pen.

    • 50dollarsforabrick says:

      Read an article that Freddy will not be putting that 400 million into free agents. If true why doesn’t that suprise us all.

      • rustyjr says:

        no surprise at all he still has his first dollar from his bris

        • NYMETSFAN718 says:

          True, they will get 20 mill per season for 20 years, = 400 mill. but what about the cost of building the stadium? They want a lilttle reimbursment. Tax payers did not pay for that stadium

        • rustyjr says:

          uh yeah we did we paid for the infrastructure around it and we are paying for the bonds the city is floating

        • NYMETSFAN718 says:

          The stadium is not 100% tax payer money, it costs 800+ million for that stadium,

        • NYMETSFAN718 says:

          Of the 880 million dollar cost of the stadium, 250 million of it was tax payer money

        • cval says:

          That’s not completely true, they received roughly $90 million from the city and $75 million in rent credits from the state. They paid something like $450 of their own money, but that is no doubt financed over 30-40 years.

        • cval says:

          Sorry, you beat me to it. your numbers are probably more up to date then mine.

        • rustyjr says:

          we are still paying for it and if memory serves me right there will be a big tax abatement for it

        • NYMETSFAN718 says:

          ok

        • NYMETSFAN718 says:

          My point is that the 400 million they will get from citi group is to offest there costs for the park, you can not look at it as total revenue.

        • cval says:

          That’s a good point, though I would think that the increased revenue they get from higher ticket prices and higher attendance will more than offset their annual financing payments on the stadium.

          To me they owe it to the fans to increase the payroll up to the luxury tax limit.

        • rustyjr says:

          ok ok jeff settle down ill give u cookie later

        • Two-By-Four says:

          “no surprise at all he still has his first dollar from his bris” LMAO

  7. zen says:

    The Mets have added first baseman Mike Carp to the 40-man roster, protecting him from selection in the Rule 5 draft on Dec. 11, at the conclusion of the winter meetings in Las Vegas. The Mets’ 40-man roster now has 34 players, leaving room for free-agent additions. –a. rubin

  8. rustyjr says:

    yeah no sean bowman which i find to be a mistake

  9. CitizenSnips says:

    If there ever was an iStadium the ticket prices would nearly double for promoting “new” technology that other, smaller ballparks have been doing for years.

  10. Hubie says:

    Anyone still think the economy will not impact baseball? This naming rights deal is going to blow up or be renegotiated some time next year. Fortunately, for baseball, the TV contract with FOX goes through 2013, so a nice fixed source of revenue that is very much needed right now.

    I think the economy continuing to slide helps the Mets right now. Some of the mid market teams are not going to be able to throw much cash around. I don’t see the Cards or Tigers being competitive bidders for a closer at this time. Same might hold true for the Brewers.

    • Well, just to play devil’s advocate here, I think it impacts the Mets more. NY is the financial capital of the world. When a few hundred thousand wall streeters are put “on the street” (no pun intended), let’s just say 1/4 of them are Mets fans. Let’s also a-ssume that 1/2 of that 1/4 goes to games. Then I would say it impacts the Mets more than it impacts the Cardinals, whose population works in the beer bottling and distributing industry (for arguments sake).

      • Hubie says:

        You may be right. Countering that though is the Mets are moving to a new ball park and it is sold out for 2009. However, I work in the financial sector and if I were to lose my job, I would certainly reduce the number of tickets I purchase (I own seasons with 3 others), or give them up totally.

        • Hubie,
          Same here. And I would do the same. I own seats with one other. I would most likely either hold onto them (because they still have my money from the Post Season tickets, and well you know) or dump them on the fans that work in beer distribution in St. Louis when Albert and the Cards come to town.

          It’s obvious the economy is going to hurt teams. Whether it’s this year or not, it doesn’t matter. Teams will eventually be pinched. Maybe the Mets don’t feel it in 2009 in ticket sales, but you can bet lots of people will be bringing sandwiches and there will be plenty of leftover David Wright jerseys on the racks.

  11. Slob says:

    If Apple ever gets the naming rights to the new stadium, I’ll never go to a Mets game again. F that company and its dopey, overpriced products.

  12. dykstraw says:

    i’m sure the deal is fine because citi will not go bankrupt and the contract will probably remain the responsibility of whoever buys citi out.

    however, i’m not so sure citi will retain its name and brand, and the proud new owner of citi may have its name over our proud new park by maybe 2010.

    united states department of the treasury field, anyone?

  13. bkfitz says:

    iStadium would break after 3 years and the Mets would have to get a new one.

  14. sanderson13 says:

    What about:

    Bailout Field
    Pelosi Park
    Paulson Stadium
    OneWorldBankWhichAteAllTheOthers Field
    Saudi Park?

    h/t to There’s Always ‘09 for the name-the-Field-level-”Shea” idea, although I’d prefer that to be used for the Upper Deck, where I might one day get a seat…

    • gipper82475 says:

      Seriously, why not a bailout for the Mets?….they have better negotiated labor deals than the Big Three auto makers, put out a far better product, even with the recent disappointments, and recently helped the NY construction trades……they cannot be harmed by the overall economic downturn or the Citigroup collapse….surely taxpayers in Atlanta, Philly, St. Louis and elsewhere will be glad to chip in (or have their kids and grandkids chip in).

      No?

  15. Protes says:

    Matt,

    If it makes you happy why not suggest CitiCore Field. Core like an apple…Corps…umm…yeah

    Or CitField – Rotten To the Core.

    OK, gotta run and hide now.

    LOL…

  16. bdwyshaps says:

    I thought the Stadium curse was pretty safe with a company as big as Citi, but I guess not…

    btw–what do we think about JetBlue for the new Jets/Giants stadium (I’ve noticed they have sponsored a lot of events at Giants Stadium this year with both teams…) Makes a ton of sense–we have the JetBlue Hanger for my beloved Jets, and Big Blue…for Big Blue.

  17. lol thanks for the comic relief Matt…I think i needed that. iStadium…lmao

  18. TurboDan says:

    Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Bin Abdulaziz Alsaud Field, anyone? We could call it “The Bin!”

    Eek, and as much as I respect Apple for their innovations, their stubbornness and arrogance as a company can get to me. I worked as a newspaper reporter for a long time, and we had Apples that crashed programs all the time. I can’t even count how many stories I had to rewrite. Plus Safari is a memory hog.

    Now, I’m running my own publication and run InDesgn CS3 on Vista machines. Lightning fast, no problems at all.

  19. iamatwork says:

    They’re not really paying $20,000,000 per year. It’s a marketing deal and only citi ATMs will be in the new park, etc etc etc.

  20. TobeRinkler says:

    Metropolitan Field.