<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Starting Pitcher: Too Many Names for One Title</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.metsblog.com/2008/12/16/starting-pitcher-too-many-names-for-one-title/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2008/12/16/starting-pitcher-too-many-names-for-one-title/</link>
	<description>Latest Mets News, Links, Rumors and Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 21:22:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Metfreek75</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2008/12/16/starting-pitcher-too-many-names-for-one-title/#comment-410241</link>
		<dc:creator>Metfreek75</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2008/12/16/starting-pitcher-too-many-names-for-one-title/#comment-410241</guid>
		<description>I say that the mets should be trying to look at ben sheets, Lowe and Wolf and that is all the mets need to finish up their bullpen, unless they try to get Perez back and if they try to get Kenshin Kawakami, I mean C&#039;mon you saw that guy pitch he was actually pretty good, BUT however he is in the late 30&#039;s so we dont know how long he can go on being that good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I say that the mets should be trying to look at ben sheets, Lowe and Wolf and that is all the mets need to finish up their bullpen, unless they try to get Perez back and if they try to get Kenshin Kawakami, I mean C&#8217;mon you saw that guy pitch he was actually pretty good, BUT however he is in the late 30&#8242;s so we dont know how long he can go on being that good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeckWizzle</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2008/12/16/starting-pitcher-too-many-names-for-one-title/#comment-410103</link>
		<dc:creator>PeckWizzle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 22:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2008/12/16/starting-pitcher-too-many-names-for-one-title/#comment-410103</guid>
		<description>Lowe/Perez and Redding/Looper and we&#039;re pretty solid. That would leave us with one of the two best options left available and a #5 that can win atleast 10 games and throws in the low to mid nineties.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lowe/Perez and Redding/Looper and we&#8217;re pretty solid. That would leave us with one of the two best options left available and a #5 that can win atleast 10 games and throws in the low to mid nineties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cver</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2008/12/16/starting-pitcher-too-many-names-for-one-title/#comment-410087</link>
		<dc:creator>cver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 21:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2008/12/16/starting-pitcher-too-many-names-for-one-title/#comment-410087</guid>
		<description>The dropoff is from Lowe to everybody else that is left, with maybe the exception of Sheets, if - a huge &quot;if&quot; - he could stay healthy.  To put Ollie in the same tier or even sentence as Lowe is a huge insult to Lowe.  This illustrates why it&#039;s important to get Lowe, because this post is painting a very grim scenario - one in which Omar overpays for Ollie (LOSES OUT ON THE 2 DRAFT PICKS!!!!!) and signs another scrub like Redding, Garcia or Milton (are they kidding?).  Nice way to start things in their new stadium.  Not that there are a ton of options, but they need to make a full press for Lowe and not try and be too cute, like I was hearing a few days ago, thinking they could get in a strong bargaining position now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The dropoff is from Lowe to everybody else that is left, with maybe the exception of Sheets, if &#8211; a huge &#8220;if&#8221; &#8211; he could stay healthy.  To put Ollie in the same tier or even sentence as Lowe is a huge insult to Lowe.  This illustrates why it&#8217;s important to get Lowe, because this post is painting a very grim scenario &#8211; one in which Omar overpays for Ollie (LOSES OUT ON THE 2 DRAFT PICKS!!!!!) and signs another scrub like Redding, Garcia or Milton (are they kidding?).  Nice way to start things in their new stadium.  Not that there are a ton of options, but they need to make a full press for Lowe and not try and be too cute, like I was hearing a few days ago, thinking they could get in a strong bargaining position now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mags.328</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2008/12/16/starting-pitcher-too-many-names-for-one-title/#comment-409894</link>
		<dc:creator>Mags.328</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 20:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2008/12/16/starting-pitcher-too-many-names-for-one-title/#comment-409894</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t help but feel concerned with Omar&#039;s plan for the #5 starter. He&#039;s talking about the dregs, reclamation projects, kids like Niese, and so on. Yikes. 

Now, I can get on board with a guy like Jason Marquis, although if we sign Lowe, which I really hope we do, then I think we could use a lefty in the 5th slot to help balance out the rotation, especially given the way the Phillies lineup is constructed- afterall, it did work this year, as Santana, and especially Ollie, did extremely well against the Phils, and helped key us to a 11-7 record against our rivals. 

I really think Randy Wolf would be a great complement to a Derek Lowe signing. Now, Wolf occasionally gets hurt, but I think this is when Niese can make his starts and get familiar with the major leagues. There you go, it all works out. Otherwise, let Niese pitch in the pen. He would give us a second lefty.

But please, Omar, you have done so well so far, and if you get Lowe, I will be so psyched because I think we would have a rotation that stacks up with anybody&#039;s, even the Yankees, but please Omar, have a care with the 5th spot. That spot could be the key that unlocks this whole rotation, and thus the team as a whole. Think about it, every four days, we could pound out four good to great starters in a row with Santana, Pelfrey, Maine, and Lowe (remember that stretch right before the all-star break, when we got 4 consecutive 3 hit games given up by the pitching staff, and then the 5th game giving up only 1 hit! How amazing was that? I thought this feat deserved more credit and more attentionthen it got. But that&#039;s our potential, not literally of course, but the talent is there).  So, if we have an actual 5th starter who can win 12  or so games like Wolf can, while at least giving us a chance to win most of his starts, then we would be so damn good. We could have numerous winning streaks, and just streak through large chunks of the season, simliar to what we did after Manuel took over. When we were winning so many games, winning just about every series, winning 9 games going into the break, winning 4 of 6 at home against the Phils and Cards (and should have swept them both, ah, but that bullpen), then after a poor road trip through Florida and Houston (again, bullpen, plus weak offense), we came back home to win 4 of 7, with a another blown save, then a 6 of 7 on the road, the home again going 5 of 7, then 6 of 8, then the collapse, with the bullpen killing us... point is, we were tearing up the NL for a while there, and our starting rotation was a huge reason why, as they kept is in just about every single game.

You can do it Omar, you can do it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t help but feel concerned with Omar&#8217;s plan for the #5 starter. He&#8217;s talking about the dregs, reclamation projects, kids like Niese, and so on. Yikes. </p>
<p>Now, I can get on board with a guy like Jason Marquis, although if we sign Lowe, which I really hope we do, then I think we could use a lefty in the 5th slot to help balance out the rotation, especially given the way the Phillies lineup is constructed- afterall, it did work this year, as Santana, and especially Ollie, did extremely well against the Phils, and helped key us to a 11-7 record against our rivals. </p>
<p>I really think Randy Wolf would be a great complement to a Derek Lowe signing. Now, Wolf occasionally gets hurt, but I think this is when Niese can make his starts and get familiar with the major leagues. There you go, it all works out. Otherwise, let Niese pitch in the pen. He would give us a second lefty.</p>
<p>But please, Omar, you have done so well so far, and if you get Lowe, I will be so psyched because I think we would have a rotation that stacks up with anybody&#8217;s, even the Yankees, but please Omar, have a care with the 5th spot. That spot could be the key that unlocks this whole rotation, and thus the team as a whole. Think about it, every four days, we could pound out four good to great starters in a row with Santana, Pelfrey, Maine, and Lowe (remember that stretch right before the all-star break, when we got 4 consecutive 3 hit games given up by the pitching staff, and then the 5th game giving up only 1 hit! How amazing was that? I thought this feat deserved more credit and more attentionthen it got. But that&#8217;s our potential, not literally of course, but the talent is there).  So, if we have an actual 5th starter who can win 12  or so games like Wolf can, while at least giving us a chance to win most of his starts, then we would be so damn good. We could have numerous winning streaks, and just streak through large chunks of the season, simliar to what we did after Manuel took over. When we were winning so many games, winning just about every series, winning 9 games going into the break, winning 4 of 6 at home against the Phils and Cards (and should have swept them both, ah, but that bullpen), then after a poor road trip through Florida and Houston (again, bullpen, plus weak offense), we came back home to win 4 of 7, with a another blown save, then a 6 of 7 on the road, the home again going 5 of 7, then 6 of 8, then the collapse, with the bullpen killing us&#8230; point is, we were tearing up the NL for a while there, and our starting rotation was a huge reason why, as they kept is in just about every single game.</p>
<p>You can do it Omar, you can do it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mags.328</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2008/12/16/starting-pitcher-too-many-names-for-one-title/#comment-409850</link>
		<dc:creator>Mags.328</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 20:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2008/12/16/starting-pitcher-too-many-names-for-one-title/#comment-409850</guid>
		<description>kistics says: 
December 16th, 2008 at 10:06 am 
&quot;Do you guys think Lowe is a legit #2? I think he is.

On the other hand, is Ollie legit #2 or even #3? I think you can make an argument for #3, but you can also make an argument for #4 as well.

Price difference between the two would probably be 4-5 mil and 4-6 wins.&quot;

Excellent point. There really is no contest between Lowe and Perez.. And while Ollie was getting knocked around the park, while walking the whole National League, Lowe was helping to pitch his team into first place and into the playoffs with a 0.58 ERA in the final month. Not bad. He also has pitched pretty well against the Phillies the past 3 years (including playoffs, 6 starts, 3 wins, 1 loss, 2 ND, 3.03 ERA, 1.12 WHIP). 

For those who want to argue for Big Game Ollie, where was he when we needed him in that Cubs game? Delgado gave him a 5-1 lead with a huge, clutch GS, and Ollie was darn quick to give it all back. Of course we still had the chance to win the game with Murphy on third with no outs. I think most Mets fans are going to remember that moment for a long time, and that game overall for all its twists and turns- and despite it all, despite giving up a 5-1 lead, despite threatening to take back the lead in the 6th, 7th, and 8th innings, with men on third with less than two outs in at least two of those innings,yet still failing each time, they  STILL had control of their own destiny after Murphy tripled. UGH!!! By the by, that&#039;s why I love the idea of Murphy in LF and batting second. He will be so clutch for us. You think the Mets scored a lot of first inning runs before, keep in mind, they never had a consistent #2 hitter, yet they still lead the world in scoring right off the bat. With Murphy in the two hole, forget about it. 

And these early runs will be all the more important now that we have such a strong Endgame with Putz and K-Rod. But who&#039;s gonna step up and pitch the 7th? Duaner? Maybe. Stokes? I don&#039;t  think so. I like him more as a floating relief pitcher. Whoever it is, it should be one of our best crossover guys. I&#039;d like to see Omar go after Joe Nelson who could come extremely cheap, or try to bring in Chad Cordero who could sign real cheap as well- low risk, high reward. How sweet would it be to have a former 35+ saves guy in the 7th, an utterly domiant 40 saves guy in the 8th, and the saves season record holder who averages over 40 saves a year pitching in the 9th? Now THAT would be a bullpen. 

Cordero wouldn&#039;t be ready for about a month into the season, but I think he would really be worth it. Remember, he&#039;s pitching the 7th, not the 8th or 9th. I really feel that in order for the values of Putz and K-Rod to be maximized, in order for that duo to be able to push the Mets over the top, we need a very strong 7th inning guy, not someone we hope can claim the job, someone who could wind up losing the spot with a few bad performance because he doesn&#039;t have an actual track record. Getting the ball to the Deadly Duo is vital. We can expect all our starters to go at least 6 innings, but not always 7. So, for all those games where the starter only goes 6 innings, or tires out during that inning and needs help getting out of it, we will need a reliable 7th inning guy, preferable a K guy. Of the current Mets, the only guy I would feel comfortable with letting him try to win the role is Duaner Sanchez, because it&#039;s possible  he can still get his old form back... Stokes is a maybe, but like I said, I think he would be more valuable in other spots. We will still need relievers in other types of games. Other than Sanchez, maybe Kunz, but we don&#039;t know if he can handle it yet, and he doesn&#039;t intimidate ML hitters yet, though given his height, if he does well, he could be quick to gain that kind of recognition. I don&#039;t know who else I would be comfortable with on the Mets. Like I said, Chad Cordero or Joe Nelson could be great in that role, especially since I think either can be had for a small amount.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kistics says:<br />
December 16th, 2008 at 10:06 am<br />
&#8220;Do you guys think Lowe is a legit #2? I think he is.</p>
<p>On the other hand, is Ollie legit #2 or even #3? I think you can make an argument for #3, but you can also make an argument for #4 as well.</p>
<p>Price difference between the two would probably be 4-5 mil and 4-6 wins.&#8221;</p>
<p>Excellent point. There really is no contest between Lowe and Perez.. And while Ollie was getting knocked around the park, while walking the whole National League, Lowe was helping to pitch his team into first place and into the playoffs with a 0.58 ERA in the final month. Not bad. He also has pitched pretty well against the Phillies the past 3 years (including playoffs, 6 starts, 3 wins, 1 loss, 2 ND, 3.03 ERA, 1.12 WHIP). </p>
<p>For those who want to argue for Big Game Ollie, where was he when we needed him in that Cubs game? Delgado gave him a 5-1 lead with a huge, clutch GS, and Ollie was darn quick to give it all back. Of course we still had the chance to win the game with Murphy on third with no outs. I think most Mets fans are going to remember that moment for a long time, and that game overall for all its twists and turns- and despite it all, despite giving up a 5-1 lead, despite threatening to take back the lead in the 6th, 7th, and 8th innings, with men on third with less than two outs in at least two of those innings,yet still failing each time, they  STILL had control of their own destiny after Murphy tripled. UGH!!! By the by, that&#8217;s why I love the idea of Murphy in LF and batting second. He will be so clutch for us. You think the Mets scored a lot of first inning runs before, keep in mind, they never had a consistent #2 hitter, yet they still lead the world in scoring right off the bat. With Murphy in the two hole, forget about it. </p>
<p>And these early runs will be all the more important now that we have such a strong Endgame with Putz and K-Rod. But who&#8217;s gonna step up and pitch the 7th? Duaner? Maybe. Stokes? I don&#8217;t  think so. I like him more as a floating relief pitcher. Whoever it is, it should be one of our best crossover guys. I&#8217;d like to see Omar go after Joe Nelson who could come extremely cheap, or try to bring in Chad Cordero who could sign real cheap as well- low risk, high reward. How sweet would it be to have a former 35+ saves guy in the 7th, an utterly domiant 40 saves guy in the 8th, and the saves season record holder who averages over 40 saves a year pitching in the 9th? Now THAT would be a bullpen. </p>
<p>Cordero wouldn&#8217;t be ready for about a month into the season, but I think he would really be worth it. Remember, he&#8217;s pitching the 7th, not the 8th or 9th. I really feel that in order for the values of Putz and K-Rod to be maximized, in order for that duo to be able to push the Mets over the top, we need a very strong 7th inning guy, not someone we hope can claim the job, someone who could wind up losing the spot with a few bad performance because he doesn&#8217;t have an actual track record. Getting the ball to the Deadly Duo is vital. We can expect all our starters to go at least 6 innings, but not always 7. So, for all those games where the starter only goes 6 innings, or tires out during that inning and needs help getting out of it, we will need a reliable 7th inning guy, preferable a K guy. Of the current Mets, the only guy I would feel comfortable with letting him try to win the role is Duaner Sanchez, because it&#8217;s possible  he can still get his old form back&#8230; Stokes is a maybe, but like I said, I think he would be more valuable in other spots. We will still need relievers in other types of games. Other than Sanchez, maybe Kunz, but we don&#8217;t know if he can handle it yet, and he doesn&#8217;t intimidate ML hitters yet, though given his height, if he does well, he could be quick to gain that kind of recognition. I don&#8217;t know who else I would be comfortable with on the Mets. Like I said, Chad Cordero or Joe Nelson could be great in that role, especially since I think either can be had for a small amount.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Slider</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2008/12/16/starting-pitcher-too-many-names-for-one-title/#comment-409814</link>
		<dc:creator>The Slider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 19:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2008/12/16/starting-pitcher-too-many-names-for-one-title/#comment-409814</guid>
		<description>Eric Milton??????  Wow.

I wouldn&#039;t mind Redding for the 5th starter&#039;s job.  He kills the Phillies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric Milton??????  Wow.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t mind Redding for the 5th starter&#8217;s job.  He kills the Phillies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nyj0126</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2008/12/16/starting-pitcher-too-many-names-for-one-title/#comment-409762</link>
		<dc:creator>nyj0126</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 18:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2008/12/16/starting-pitcher-too-many-names-for-one-title/#comment-409762</guid>
		<description>If the Mets were actually to sign Sheets, it can&#039;t be for any more than two years. Like 2 year/28 million at most. Garland will probably take like 3 year/33 million so the pros and cons have to be weighed on which deal is better for the team. Lowe&#039;s going to get more than Perez because more teams want him. Boras is insane to think he can get 5 year/70 million. But I credit him for trying. Kinzer originally said K-Rod wanted 5 year/75 million which is pretty similar. And eventually he came down to 3 year/37 million - half the dollar amount of what he wanted. Although maybe not at the same rate because of how many closers were out there, it can be expected that Perez price tag will come down a lot. So my expectation is that the Mets re-sign Oliver Perez to 3 year/36 million with a 12 million team option or a 3 million buyout. I see Lowe going to Boston when they lose out on Texeira (my guess is the Orioles because he&#039;s from Maryland). They may not even need Lowe already having Lester/Daiske/Beckett/Wakefield, but they&#039;ll do anything to keep up with the Yankees and apparently the Rays now too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the Mets were actually to sign Sheets, it can&#8217;t be for any more than two years. Like 2 year/28 million at most. Garland will probably take like 3 year/33 million so the pros and cons have to be weighed on which deal is better for the team. Lowe&#8217;s going to get more than Perez because more teams want him. Boras is insane to think he can get 5 year/70 million. But I credit him for trying. Kinzer originally said K-Rod wanted 5 year/75 million which is pretty similar. And eventually he came down to 3 year/37 million &#8211; half the dollar amount of what he wanted. Although maybe not at the same rate because of how many closers were out there, it can be expected that Perez price tag will come down a lot. So my expectation is that the Mets re-sign Oliver Perez to 3 year/36 million with a 12 million team option or a 3 million buyout. I see Lowe going to Boston when they lose out on Texeira (my guess is the Orioles because he&#8217;s from Maryland). They may not even need Lowe already having Lester/Daiske/Beckett/Wakefield, but they&#8217;ll do anything to keep up with the Yankees and apparently the Rays now too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nyj0126</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2008/12/16/starting-pitcher-too-many-names-for-one-title/#comment-409755</link>
		<dc:creator>nyj0126</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 18:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2008/12/16/starting-pitcher-too-many-names-for-one-title/#comment-409755</guid>
		<description>They shouldn&#039;t be over looking Sheets as much as they have because he&#039;s still a really good pitcher. I can understand their concern for his health though. And his decline at the end of the year. The Mets have enough to worry about with John Maine possibly having arm problems down the road. Oliver Perez, Derek Lowe and Jon Garland are three of the most healthy starting pitchers in baseball. Over the past few years, Wolf and Sheets have been some of the more unhealthy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They shouldn&#8217;t be over looking Sheets as much as they have because he&#8217;s still a really good pitcher. I can understand their concern for his health though. And his decline at the end of the year. The Mets have enough to worry about with John Maine possibly having arm problems down the road. Oliver Perez, Derek Lowe and Jon Garland are three of the most healthy starting pitchers in baseball. Over the past few years, Wolf and Sheets have been some of the more unhealthy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nyj0126</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2008/12/16/starting-pitcher-too-many-names-for-one-title/#comment-409753</link>
		<dc:creator>nyj0126</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 18:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2008/12/16/starting-pitcher-too-many-names-for-one-title/#comment-409753</guid>
		<description>Two or three of the strongest suitors for Lowe are probably out now. One, the Phillies. They signed Ibanez, re-signed Moyer and signed Park. The Yankees have been mentioned less to him since signing CC and Burnett. They don&#039;t want another long term investment and are turning their attention to Pettite or Sheets. And the Braves just signed Furcal to at least the same 4 year/40 million offer the A&#039;s gave him. That move may eventually lead to trading Escobar or Johnson for Peavy who&#039;ll fill out their rotation and raise their payroll.

The Red Sox just made a huge offer to Texeira. So they&#039;re not that aggressive in pursuing Lowe. Signing Lowe now may be a better bet for the Mets because if they lose out on Texeira (odds say they will with the O&#039;s, Nats, Angels and Yankees all in it), because the Red Sox want to make one impact signing. Outside of the Red Sox though, who is at least willing to give Lowe like 4 year/52-56 million? Maybe the Brewers or Blue Jays?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two or three of the strongest suitors for Lowe are probably out now. One, the Phillies. They signed Ibanez, re-signed Moyer and signed Park. The Yankees have been mentioned less to him since signing CC and Burnett. They don&#8217;t want another long term investment and are turning their attention to Pettite or Sheets. And the Braves just signed Furcal to at least the same 4 year/40 million offer the A&#8217;s gave him. That move may eventually lead to trading Escobar or Johnson for Peavy who&#8217;ll fill out their rotation and raise their payroll.</p>
<p>The Red Sox just made a huge offer to Texeira. So they&#8217;re not that aggressive in pursuing Lowe. Signing Lowe now may be a better bet for the Mets because if they lose out on Texeira (odds say they will with the O&#8217;s, Nats, Angels and Yankees all in it), because the Red Sox want to make one impact signing. Outside of the Red Sox though, who is at least willing to give Lowe like 4 year/52-56 million? Maybe the Brewers or Blue Jays?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nyj0126</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2008/12/16/starting-pitcher-too-many-names-for-one-title/#comment-409737</link>
		<dc:creator>nyj0126</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 18:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2008/12/16/starting-pitcher-too-many-names-for-one-title/#comment-409737</guid>
		<description>An &#039;&#039;out of favor&#039;&#039; 5 pitcher isn&#039;t what we need.
Eric Milton, Livan Hernandez and Bartolo Colon would qualify as that. Signing Braden Looper, Odalis Perez, Paul Byrd or trading for Jason Marquis. Tim Redding&#039;s not a bad option either. Looper is the best option as a 5. He wasn&#039;t offered arbitration. He&#039;s had 2 solid back-to-back seasons as a back-end SP. 12-14, 199 IP, 4.18 ERA can&#039;t go unrecognized. He&#039;ll probably take about 2 year/14 million.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An &#8221;out of favor&#8221; 5 pitcher isn&#8217;t what we need.<br />
Eric Milton, Livan Hernandez and Bartolo Colon would qualify as that. Signing Braden Looper, Odalis Perez, Paul Byrd or trading for Jason Marquis. Tim Redding&#8217;s not a bad option either. Looper is the best option as a 5. He wasn&#8217;t offered arbitration. He&#8217;s had 2 solid back-to-back seasons as a back-end SP. 12-14, 199 IP, 4.18 ERA can&#8217;t go unrecognized. He&#8217;ll probably take about 2 year/14 million.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (Requested URI is rejected)

Served from: www.metsblog.com @ 2012-02-14 07:16:48 -->
