<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: News: J.J. Putz is Ahead of Schedule</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.metsblog.com/2009/07/09/news-jj-putz-is-ahead-of-schedule/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/07/09/news-jj-putz-is-ahead-of-schedule/</link>
	<description>MetsBlog.com features the latest Mets rumors, player movement, and news circulating around the Internet, as well as Mets related insights and opinions by Matthew Cerrone and his team of guest bloggers.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:52:02 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jesse52782</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/07/09/news-jj-putz-is-ahead-of-schedule/#comment-579769</link>
		<dc:creator>jesse52782</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 18:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2009/07/09/news-jj-putz-is-ahead-of-schedule/#comment-579769</guid>
		<description>&quot;miserable&quot; and &quot;frustrating&quot; like watching this team right now</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;miserable&#8221; and &#8220;frustrating&#8221; like watching this team right now</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark4212</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/07/09/news-jj-putz-is-ahead-of-schedule/#comment-579766</link>
		<dc:creator>mark4212</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 18:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2009/07/09/news-jj-putz-is-ahead-of-schedule/#comment-579766</guid>
		<description>They weren&#039;t that way when freddy got into the game. They just ended that way.

But most of their losses they socred no more then 1 or 2 runs in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They weren&#8217;t that way when freddy got into the game. They just ended that way.</p>
<p>But most of their losses they socred no more then 1 or 2 runs in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dustin in ben lomond</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/07/09/news-jj-putz-is-ahead-of-schedule/#comment-579765</link>
		<dc:creator>dustin in ben lomond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 18:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2009/07/09/news-jj-putz-is-ahead-of-schedule/#comment-579765</guid>
		<description>wow. that could be potent. 107 + 385 + 230 = 722 career saves. 

Anyone notice that all four of Mets last four wins were one run games?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow. that could be potent. 107 + 385 + 230 = 722 career saves. </p>
<p>Anyone notice that all four of Mets last four wins were one run games?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dwright5_godsend</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/07/09/news-jj-putz-is-ahead-of-schedule/#comment-579755</link>
		<dc:creator>dwright5_godsend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 18:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2009/07/09/news-jj-putz-is-ahead-of-schedule/#comment-579755</guid>
		<description>Yep. We need Reyes, Delgado, and Beltran back before we can seriously contend for anything. If we had those three, I wouldn&#039;t mind because I have faith in Parnell &amp; Feliciano to hold down the 8th.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep. We need Reyes, Delgado, and Beltran back before we can seriously contend for anything. If we had those three, I wouldn&#8217;t mind because I have faith in Parnell &amp; Feliciano to hold down the 8th.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xavier22</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/07/09/news-jj-putz-is-ahead-of-schedule/#comment-579751</link>
		<dc:creator>Xavier22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 17:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2009/07/09/news-jj-putz-is-ahead-of-schedule/#comment-579751</guid>
		<description>there&#039;s the rub.  The Mets get Putz and Wags back, but end up losing a lot of low scoring ballgames down the stretch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there&#8217;s the rub.  The Mets get Putz and Wags back, but end up losing a lot of low scoring ballgames down the stretch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimyager</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/07/09/news-jj-putz-is-ahead-of-schedule/#comment-579744</link>
		<dc:creator>jimyager</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 17:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2009/07/09/news-jj-putz-is-ahead-of-schedule/#comment-579744</guid>
		<description>Think of this, Putz in the 7th, WAGS in the 8th and K-Rod in the 9th ? Who could ask for more, of course, that assumes we havd scored more runs than the other team :}</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think of this, Putz in the 7th, WAGS in the 8th and K-Rod in the 9th ? Who could ask for more, of course, that assumes we havd scored more runs than the other team :}</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dwright5_godsend</title>
		<link>http://www.metsblog.com/2009/07/09/news-jj-putz-is-ahead-of-schedule/#comment-579743</link>
		<dc:creator>dwright5_godsend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 17:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metsblog.com/2009/07/09/news-jj-putz-is-ahead-of-schedule/#comment-579743</guid>
		<description>Good news...maybe he can come back soon enough to increase his status to a type-A FA this offseason. I&#039;d take the draft pick, especially with the supposed (and I do mean &quot;supposed&quot;) talent in next year&#039;s draft.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good news&#8230;maybe he can come back soon enough to increase his status to a type-A FA this offseason. I&#8217;d take the draft pick, especially with the supposed (and I do mean &#8220;supposed&#8221;) talent in next year&#8217;s draft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.104 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2009-11-21 22:55:06 -->
