avatar

Buzz: The Mets, and others, in Roy Halladay Derby

by Matthew Cerrone on October 7th, 2009 at 6:49 am

David Waldstein of the New York Times believes the Mets will look in to acquiring Roy Halladay, but, “It is unlikely they will have the prospects to entice the Blue Jays to make a trade.”

…i agree… but, let’s not get too hung up on prospects and farm systems… much like with the Johan Santana situation with the Twins a few years ago, because he has a full no-trade clause, if halladay flat-out rejects toronto’s efforts to sign him to an extension, the Halladay Derby might come down to the team capable of not only trading prospects to get him, but who also has the cash to sign him to what will most certainly be Sabathia– or Santana-like long-term deal… and so, again, like with santana, if the Yankees do not plan to spend that money on pitching, or if the Red Sox decide to spend on a bat, etc., who knows how the market will break and shape out…

…in the end, at least as of right now, i have no clue if the Mets stand a chance of getting halladay, who of course they’ll have interest in… i mean, who wouldn’t have interest in him… maybe they get him, maybe they don’t, maybe they have a chance, maybe they don’t… time will tell… all i’m saying is, to frame his availability as one of just prospects and a straight-up trade is ignoring the realities of MLB… instead, it’s about who has just enough talent to get him, because they’re capable of signing him to a seven-year deal… it’s a two-part move…