Comments on: Buzz: The Arbitration Process is Outdated http://www.metsblog.com/2009/11/02/buzz-the-arbitration-process-is-outdated/ Latest Mets News, Links, Rumors and Opinion Fri, 04 Feb 2011 21:22:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Bench5urvivor http://www.metsblog.com/2009/11/02/buzz-the-arbitration-process-is-outdated/#comment-608488 Bench5urvivor Mon, 02 Nov 2009 20:19:30 +0000 http://www.metsblog.com/2009/11/02/buzz-the-arbitration-process-is-outdated/#comment-608488 Stickguy, you are correct. Teahan still has two years before he is a full fledged FA. He can: 1) sign a one year deal after which he would still be under team control for one more year of arbitration or a mutually agreed-to deal, or 2) sign a deal of at least two years and become a FA after that, still subject to his team offering arbitration. Stickguy, you are correct. Teahan still has two years before he is a full fledged FA.
He can: 1) sign a one year deal after which he would still be under team control for one more year of arbitration or a mutually agreed-to deal, or 2) sign a deal of at least two years and become a FA after that, still subject to his team offering arbitration.

]]> By: Agees Catch http://www.metsblog.com/2009/11/02/buzz-the-arbitration-process-is-outdated/#comment-608485 Agees Catch Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:39:15 +0000 http://www.metsblog.com/2009/11/02/buzz-the-arbitration-process-is-outdated/#comment-608485 I don't get the love for Teahan. Of the players mentioned in the post, Hardy (who i would stick in LF) and Jackson (who I would platoon with Murphy) make the most sense. I don’t get the love for Teahan. Of the players mentioned in the post, Hardy (who i would stick in LF) and Jackson (who I would platoon with Murphy) make the most sense.

]]> By: stickguy http://www.metsblog.com/2009/11/02/buzz-the-arbitration-process-is-outdated/#comment-608480 stickguy Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:30:49 +0000 http://www.metsblog.com/2009/11/02/buzz-the-arbitration-process-is-outdated/#comment-608480 Just to be clear, if he is non-tendered, he will sign a FA deal for whatever he can get for 2010, and then be eligible for arbitration after the 2010 season, right? Or IOW, the FA deal now replaces his current arb rights? Just to be clear, if he is non-tendered, he will sign a FA deal for whatever he can get for 2010, and then be eligible for arbitration after the 2010 season, right?

Or IOW, the FA deal now replaces his current arb rights?

]]>