Daily Archives: November 20, 2009
Jerry Crasnick of ESPN.com says the Marlins and RHP Josh Johnson have been unable to reach an agreement on a long-term contract extension.
Crasnick quotes Johnson’s agent, Matt Sosnick, as saying, “There’s no chance of doing a long-term deal with the Marlins…We made it clear that it was going to be this year or it wasn’t going to happen. It was now or never. And the Marlins agreed.”
Johnson is eligible for arbitration each of the next two seasons, after which he can become a free agent following 2011.
…johnson is quickly becoming one of the premier pitchers in baseball, and at his age i don’t know why Florida wouldn’t go beyond three years in a deal, because they would likely lose him anyway to free agency when he is 28 and just entering the prime of his career… there isn’t any indication the Marlins are going to make him available right now, but the longer they can’t come together on an agreement, the more likely he will be dealt sooner rather than later, especially with his value so high, which would command greater value in return…
…i think johnson is great… what’s not to like… he is young, a hard thrower, he can shut down big time offenses and he was dominant against the Mets in 2009…
…if the Mets are interested in dealing prospects for pitching as they seem to be with Roy Halladay, i feel they should at least see if this kid is available, although i find it hard to believe that these two teams would make a trade given their recent history on the field…
Added to by Matthew Cerrone:
…i think he’s exactly the type of pitcher they’re trying to acquire… the thing is, i bet the Marlins do not look to trade him until at least the middle of next season, depending on where they are in the standings… there is a good chance they contend for the division next year, if not more… it’s not their style to cut bait just yet… sadly, we all know how they operate, and i think they’re more likely to make 2010 the year to push for a ring, then look to trade him following the season, win or lose…
Mike Silverman of the Boston Herald says that the Red Sox are expressing interest in Matt Holliday.
According to Silverman, the Red Sox consider Holliday a more expensive alternative to Jason Bay, should they be unable to retain him.
Speaking of Bay, Peter Gammons of ESPN.com believes that he will eventually re-sign with the Red Sox for somewhere in the four year, $64 million range.
Yesterday Jon Heyman of SI.com said that Bay recently rejected the Red Sox initial offer of four years and $60 million, which you can see here.
…i don’t know what Bay will ultimately get, but considering what he recently turned down from Boston i feel it will take considerably more to secure him…but i do agree and think Bay will ultimately re-sign in Boston but i feel that he will wait for Holliday to sign first so he has a basis to set his salary demands on…
Gammons does not think that the Mets will go that high to sign Bay, and he thinks the Angels are too busy trying to retain Chone Figgins and John Lackey.
Jon Heyman of SI.com says people at the MLB Owners Meetings in Chicago are saying the Mets will not be big players for either Blue Jays RHP Roy Halladay or RHP John Lackey.
…well, that’s nice, but i am far more concerned with whether the Mets owners think they’ll be big players for halladay or lackey…
In a recent report for SI.com, Heyman 
previews the free-agent market, offering predictions on where, and for how much, players will end up signing this winter, from Jason Bay to Chone Figgins to Miguel Tejada to Mike Gonzalez, and others.
Despite what he wrote on Twitter, Heyman lists the Mets as possible suitors for free-agents Matt Holliday and Lackey, as well as Orlando Hudson and Joel Pineiro.
According to Heyman, some baseball executives believe Holliday be end up signing a deal worth half of what Mark Teixeira signed last winter.
…so, half of texiera would be, say, a four– or five-year deal, worth around $90 million or so…
According to Adam Rubin, in a report for the Daily News, this off season, the Mets will look for a power upgrade in left field.
First of all, this idea that the team MUST improve their power is important, but the goal should not be that simple. I mean, Rob Deer hit for power, but I would not say he is the prototype the Mets should be gunning for.
That said, Giants GM Brian Sabean told the San Francisco Chronicle that he does not expect to contact free-agent OF Matt Holliday or OF Jason Bay about playing for the Giants.
Meanwhile, Jayson Stark of ESPN.com recently said, “There are no signs the Yankees are in on either Holliday or Bay.” In fact, according to FoxSports.com, the Yankees might be passing on Holliday and Bay, “in order to wait one more year for Rays left fielder Carl Crawford?”
The Cardinals would like to re-sign Holliday. However, the team’s chairman, Bill DeWitt Jr., told ESPN Radio, ‘if a big-market franchise goes all-out to land Holliday, the Cardinals won’t have a chance.’
Yesterday, Angels owner Arte Moreno flatly told the Los Angeles Times, “Holliday is not going to be an Angel.”
So, of the teams who can afford him, who is interested in Holliday?
I believe the Mets would love to sign him, but not to an eight-year deal, like his agent, Scott Boras, keeps pushing in the media.
Frankly, I see this situation very, very similar to how the market was before the 2005 season for Carlos Beltran. In the end, Beltran had no choice but to sign with the Mets, despite making a last-ditch effort to end up in the Bronx. From what I can gather, the Mets would prefer to sign Holliday to a four– or five-year deal, worth around $15 million per season.
However, Boras is thinking more like eight-years, $180 million.
In the end, I still believe Holliday will end up signing a six-year deal, with whomever jumps the total value over $100 million.
I hope it is the Mets.
I feel Holliday is worth this type of money, because he’s young enough, well-rounded enough, he’s aggressive, he’s looking to be a leader and a star on a high-profile team, he’s better on defense than Bay, the Mets can afford him, he’s a terrific hitter – better than people probably even realize – and he solves a problem in the field (range) and in the lineup (balance and power) that the team has been trying to solve for years.
In the New York Times, Ben Shpigel does a fantastic job digging in to why the Mets spend as they do on their draft picks.
According to Shpigel, Omar Minaya said the team will spend more in the 2010 draft, when they have the No. 7 pick over all.
…like i said last month, i have talked to a few player agents over the last week, and to a man they all say it is a given that the Mets are notorious for not spending heavily on 
the draft… and, since this is understood going in, top players do not slip to them… for more on this idea of drafting over slot, click here…
Speaking of the Mets farm system, check out the Daily Stache, where Michael Ganci talks with minor-league guru Jonathan Mayo from MiLB.com the team’s top prospects, including Fernando Martinez, Brad Holt, Jeurys Familia, Jenrry Mejia, and others.
In the end, Mayo feels the Mets still rank among the league’s worst farm systems, but, he says, “There are some interesting young arms from international scouting efforts and Ike Davis looks legit.”
Update, 12:22 pm:
Rangers reporter T.R. Sullivan of MLB.com talked to a Rangers official who said this deal is ‘not happening.’
Similarly, Tim Dierkes of MLB Trade Rumors talked to a source who said the deal is not being discussed.
…if you recall, when rosenthal reported 
on the Mets-Cubs-Blue Jays three-way a few weeks ago, it was the Blue Jays who came out and denied it… today, we get Mets-Cubs-Rangers, and, again, it’s the third team who is denying it…
…one thing is clear, the Mets do not want bradley and the Cubs do not want castillo, but they are apparently one another’s only shot of getting rid of these people, and so they’re obviously working hard to find a third team to help make it happen…
Original Post, 11:28 am:
Phil Rogers of the Chicago Tribune believes the Mets, Cubs and Rangers have discussed a three-way trade that would send Luis Castillo to Chicago, Milton Bradley to Texas and Kevin Millwood to New York.
Rogers quotes as saying ‘the deal has legs,’ and, “There’s a deal to be made there.”
Adam, the Brooklyn Met Fan, likes the soon-to-be-released retro jersey from the Mets.
Bill Price of the Daily News explains why the Mets HAVE to sign free-agent OF Matt Holliday.
In a Q&A Mailbag for MLB.com, Marty Noble answers questions about finding power in the lineup, making Gary Carter a manager, and putting Daniel Muprhy at second base, among other things.
…i no longer read noble’s mailbags for his insight in to the team, so much as i read to see his new and exciting ways of dismissing fan-generated ideas that do not meet his standards… i don’t know if i fear his wit, or find it to be hilarious… either way, it’s entertaining…
Speaking of which, Ben Testa of Metsies and other Musings takes a look at ‘the fickle New York media.’
Rick Ryan of Blog Like a Champion Today puts forth his plan for the Mets off season, which is built around either trading for Roy Halladay or signing John Lackey.
Lastly, speaking of Halladay and Lackey, Kingman of the Real Dirty debates which of the two is a better pitcher.
According to Adam Rubin, in a report for the Daily News, the Mets off-season shopping list is as follows:
- Catcher to replace Brian Schneider.
- Power upgrade in left field.
- Second baseman if Luis Castillo can be traded.
- Rotation help.
- Eighth-inning reliever.
- Second lefthander in the bullpen to pair with Pedro Feliciano.
Yes, I like the simple idea of getting 20 home runs out of Benjie Molina and Omar Santos, adding a type of power-balance to the lineup that most teams do not have. However, if the Mets are going to have the free-swinging Jeff Francoeur in the lower half of their lineup, and the pitcher hitting ninth, the thought of putting Molina between them, a guy who is making less and less contact, while also walking less, with each passing season, it all makes me uneasy. In the end, he is all about those 20 home runs… and that’s about it. Plus, he’ll be 36 next summer… and, signing a 36–
year-old catcher to a two-year, $14 million deal just doesn’t seem smart to me. If he could be had for around half that, for just one year, he’d be worth it… but, I don’t think 15 or so additional home runs is worth that type of commitment.
No, I don’t yet know who I prefer. Free-agent C Rod Barajas hit just .226, but with 19 HR and 71 RBI, in 125 games for the Blue Jays this season – he hit .267 against left-handed pitching, while Omir Santos hit .283 against righties.
Barajas will require far less money, and can probably be had on a one-year deal, and though he’ll only hit around .230, he is capable of cracking 15 or so home runs, and he’ll play significantly better defense than Molina.
The thing is, there is a buzz in baseball suggesting guys like D-Backs C Chris Snyder, Royals C John Buck and Pirates C Ryan Doumit, among others, might all be available in trade. Plus, there is a good a chance a collection of these type of catchers end up on the free-agent market if they are non tendered.
So, the Mets should most certainly explore this end of the catcher’s market first, knowing guys like Molina and Barajas are not going to sign a new contract without checking with Omar Minaya for first… and, who knows, maybe this will end like in 2005, when the Mets flirted all winter with Molina and Ramon Hernandez, only to trade with the Marlins to get Paul LoDuca.
Update, 10:17 am:
For more on why the Mets should not sign Molina, check out Ted Berg’s post on his blog, Ted Quarters.
Stan McNeal of the Sporting News previews the MLB Hot Stove season, discussing, ‘Truths and half-truths of free agency and trade talk.’
According to McNeal, “The Mets need a splash.”
…ugh… no… the Mets don’t NEED a splash… the Mets need to get their act together and win games… if they can do this by taking baby steps in the shallow-end of the pool, without creating a ripple, i’ll take it… just get it together, whatever it takes… but, this pretend idea that the team MUST make a splash, for, what, to get the back page from the Yankees, is how the team will get itself in trouble…
McNeal believes ‘some teams need to win in the winter,’ like the Mets, ‘to have a chance next summer.’
He concludes, “If the Mets don’t sign Matt Holliday or John Lackey or make a blockbuster trade, their offseason will be considered a disappointment. And another lousy season likely will follow.”
…really… is that how it works… just like that… so, who was Tampa Bay’s big splash in 2008… take your time… you can get back to me…
…again, it’s about quality, not quantity… make smart choices… cost and hype are secondary… i’ll take a smart, effective, inexpensive decision that leads to winning over a stupid, irrational and costly one that leads to losing any day…
To read more from McNeal, who writes about potential off season trades including Roy Halladay and Carl Crawford; bargain players who can be had; and how the economy might affect it all, check out his report for the Sporting News, here.
